These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

216 related items for PubMed ID: 16909491

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Mother, may I?: ramifications for parental involvement laws for minors seeking abortion services.
    Blasdell J.
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 16526133
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. "Special weight" for best-interests minors in the new era of parental autonomy.
    Storrow RF, Martinez S.
    Wis L Rev; 2003; (5):789-841. PubMed ID: 16437822
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
    Ehrlich JS.
    Mich J Gend Law; 2000; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Splitting the baby: when can a pregnant minor obtain an abortion without parental consent? The Ex parte Anonymous cases (Alabama 2001).
    Rosenberg SP.
    Conn Law Rev; 2002; 34(3):1109-41. PubMed ID: 15212029
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M.
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Access to abortion pared at state level.
    Connolly C.
    Washington Post; 2005 Aug 29; ():A1, A4. PubMed ID: 16514735
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Abortion notification bill resurfaces in Richmond.
    Hockstader L.
    Washington Post; 1987 Jan 18; ():D1, D13. PubMed ID: 11647810
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Court to tackle abortion again after 5 years; parent notification case; in considering technical issues, justices rejoin a fractious debate.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 2005 May 24; ():A1, A17. PubMed ID: 15948341
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Case reopens abortion issue for justices.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov 29; ():A19. PubMed ID: 16450459
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.