These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
287 related items for PubMed ID: 16915915
21. Mycobacterium tuberculosis RuvA induces two distinct types of structural distortions between the homologous and heterologous Holliday junctions. Khanduja JS, Tripathi P, Muniyappa K. Biochemistry; 2009 Jan 13; 48(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 19072585 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. IS911 partial transposition products and their processing by the Escherichia coli RecG helicase. Turlan C, Loot C, Chandler M. Mol Microbiol; 2004 Aug 13; 53(4):1021-33. PubMed ID: 15306008 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Recombinational DNA repair of damaged replication forks in Escherichia coli: questions. Cox MM. Annu Rev Genet; 2001 Aug 13; 35():53-82. PubMed ID: 11700277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Instability of inhibited replication forks in E. coli. Kuzminov A. Bioessays; 1995 Aug 13; 17(8):733-41. PubMed ID: 7661854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Interplay between DNA replication and recombination in prokaryotes. Kreuzer KN. Annu Rev Microbiol; 2005 Aug 13; 59():43-67. PubMed ID: 15792496 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Preferential post-replication repair of DNA lesions situated on the leading strand of plasmids in Escherichia coli. Bichara M, Fuchs RP, Cordonnier A, Lambert IB. Mol Microbiol; 2009 Jan 13; 71(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 19017273 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The importance of repairing stalled replication forks. Cox MM, Goodman MF, Kreuzer KN, Sherratt DJ, Sandler SJ, Marians KJ. Nature; 2000 Mar 02; 404(6773):37-41. PubMed ID: 10716434 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork. Andreassen PR, Ho GP, D'Andrea AD. Carcinogenesis; 2006 May 02; 27(5):883-92. PubMed ID: 16490739 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]