These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

830 related items for PubMed ID: 16918612

  • 1. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
    Betts CJ, Dearman RJ, Heylings JR, Kimber I, Basketter DA.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
    Takeyoshi M, Iida K, Shiraishi K, Hoshuyama S.
    J Appl Toxicol; 2005 Sep; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
    Takeyoshi M, Noda S, Yamazaki S, Kakishima H, Yamasaki K, Kimber I.
    J Appl Toxicol; 2004 Sep; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
    Gerberick GF, Robinson MK, Ryan CA, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Basketter DA, Wright Z, Marks JG.
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
    Schneider K, Akkan Z.
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay.
    Dearman RJ, Betts CJ, Farr C, McLaughlin J, Berdasco N, Wiench K, Kimber I.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Oct; 57(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 17868217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
    Jowsey IR, Clapp CJ, Safford B, Gibbons BT, Basketter DA.
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.
    Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Dearman RJ, Kimber I.
    Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes.
    Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Kimber I, Dearman RJ, Lea LJ, Basketter DA.
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Mar; 11(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 10684384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation.
    Basketter DA, Gerberick F, Kimber I.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17627643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds.
    Basketter DA, Clapp C, Jefferies D, Safford B, Ryan CA, Gerberick F, Dearman RJ, Kimber I.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):260-7. PubMed ID: 16283904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde.
    Hilton J, Dearman RJ, Harvey P, Evans P, Basketter DA, Kimber I.
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Mar; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 9471984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Potency and risk assessment of a skin-sensitizing disperse dye using the local lymph node assay.
    Betts CJ, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Maibach HI.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 May; 52(5):268-72. PubMed ID: 15899000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens.
    Gerberick GF, Vassallo JD, Bailey RE, Chaney JG, Morrall SW, Lepoittevin JP.
    Toxicol Sci; 2004 Oct; 81(2):332-43. PubMed ID: 15254333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH.
    Basketter DA, McFadden JF, Gerberick F, Cockshott A, Kimber I.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Feb; 60(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19207375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitizing chemicals.
    Basketter DA, Gerberick GF, Kimber I.
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007 Feb; 26(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 18058304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The local lymph node assay and skin sensitization testing.
    Kimber I, Dearman RJ.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010 Feb; 598():221-31. PubMed ID: 19967517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment.
    Basketter D, Darlenski R, Fluhr JW.
    Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2008 Feb; 21(4):191-202. PubMed ID: 18509253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The use of ethanol:diethylphthalate as a vehicle for the local lymph node assay.
    Betts CJ, Beresford L, Dearman RJ, Lalko J, Api AP, Kimber I.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17244073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A chemical dataset for evaluation of alternative approaches to skin-sensitization testing.
    Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Kern PS, Dearman RJ, Kimber I, Patlewicz GY, Basketter DA.
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):274-88. PubMed ID: 15209809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 42.