These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

971 related items for PubMed ID: 16924979

  • 21. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW.
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y.
    J Dent; 2010 Mar; 38(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 19840829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.
    Shi L, Wang X, Zhao Q, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Ren Y, Chen Z.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Mar; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20166406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. A retrospective clinical study of cervical restorations: longevity and failure-prognostic variables.
    Namgung C, Rho YJ, Jin BH, Lim BS, Cho BH.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Mar; 38(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 23215544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H, Ghavamnasiri M, Manari V.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov 01; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Ardenghi TM, Zanatta FB, Balbinot CE, García-Godoy F, De Araujo FB.
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec 01; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
    Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, Gregory PN, Owens BM.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun 01; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Aboush YE, Torabzadeh H.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jun 01; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A randomized clinical evaluation of a one- and two-step self-etch adhesive over 24 months.
    Loguercio AD, Mânica D, Ferneda F, Zander-Grande C, Amaral R, Stanislawczuk R, de Carvalho RM, Manso A, Reis A.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Jun 01; 35(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 20533625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 49.