These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
560 related items for PubMed ID: 16939480
1. Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation. Perner A, Faber T. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1068-73. PubMed ID: 16939480 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, Boucau C, Simon R, Hénaine R, Lehot JJ. Anesth Analg; 2009 Feb; 108(2):513-7. PubMed ID: 19151280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation. Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions. de Waal EE, Rex S, Kruitwagen CL, Kalkman CJ, Buhre WF. Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [An evaluation of stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated elderly patients with severe sepsis]. Yu YH, Dai HW, Yan ML, Gong SJ, Cai GL, Zhang ZC, Chen J, Yan J. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2009 Aug; 21(8):463-5. PubMed ID: 19695166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of elevated PEEP on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in a pediatric animal model. Renner J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Hedderich J, Steinfath M, Scholz J, Bein B. Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 18(12):1170-7. PubMed ID: 19076570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery. Bennett-Guerrero E, Kahn RA, Moskowitz DM, Falcucci O, Bodian CA. Mt Sinai J Med; 2002 Dec; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing fluid responses after coronary surgery: role of mathematical coupling of global end-diastolic volume to cardiac output measured by transpulmonary thermodilution. Breukers RM, de Wilde RB, van den Berg PC, Jansen JR, Faes TJ, Twisk JW, Groeneveld AB. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Nov; 26(11):954-60. PubMed ID: 19652601 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]