These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

198 related items for PubMed ID: 16941091

  • 21. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreatobiliary diseases: a prospective study.
    Fernández-Esparrach G, Ginès A, Sánchez M, Pagés M, Pellisé M, Fernández-Cruz L, López-Boado MA, Quintó L, Navarro S, Sendino O, Cárdenas A, Ayuso C, Bordas JM, Llach J, Castells A.
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Aug; 102(8):1632-9. PubMed ID: 17521400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for diagnosing stones in the common bile duct in patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiograms.
    Richard F, Boustany M, Britt LD.
    Am J Surg; 2013 Apr; 205(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 23518180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis: analysis of patients with negative MRCP.
    Chang JH, Lee IS, Lim YS, Jung SH, Paik CN, Kim HK, Kim TH, Kim CW, Han SW, Choi MG, Jung IS.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 22149906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Dynamic liver test patterns do not predict bile duct stones.
    Yu CY, Roth N, Jani N, Cho J, Van Dam J, Selby R, Buxbaum J.
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Oct; 33(10):3300-3313. PubMed ID: 30911921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis.
    Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen GM, Adler DG.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Aug; 64(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 16860077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Sensitivity and Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography versus Endoscopic Ultrasonography against Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Diagnosing Choledocholithiasis: The Indonesian Experience.
    Makmun D, Fauzi A, Shatri H.
    Clin Endosc; 2017 Sep; 50(5):486-490. PubMed ID: 28241408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
    Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Chey WD, Francis IR, Nandi PS.
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Evaluation of a new sequence of magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography in thick cut and one shot acquisition].
    Mougenel JL, Hudziak H, Ernst O, Dupas B, Lefevre F, Barraud H, Watelet J, Cezard O, Regent D, Bigard MA.
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Oct; 24(10):888-95. PubMed ID: 11084424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Prospective study of endoscopic ultrasound performance in suspected choledocholithiasis.
    Aljebreen A, Azzam N, Eloubeidi MA.
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 May; 23(5):741-5. PubMed ID: 18248382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis: Do Benefits Outweigh the Costs?
    Ward WH, Fluke LM, Hoagland BD, Zarow GJ, Held JM, Ricca RL.
    Am Surg; 2015 Jul; 81(7):720-5. PubMed ID: 26140894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: An institutional analysis and literature review.
    Badger WR, Borgert AJ, Kallies KJ, Kothari SN.
    Am J Surg; 2017 Aug; 214(2):251-255. PubMed ID: 27986260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Does intravenous glucagon improve common bile duct visualisation during magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? Results in 42 patients.
    Dalal PU, Howlett DC, Sallomi DF, Marchbank ND, Watson GM, Marr A, Dunk AA, Smith AD.
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Mar; 49(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 14962656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature.
    Polistina FA, Frego M, Bisello M, Manzi E, Vardanega A, Perin B.
    World J Radiol; 2015 Apr 28; 7(4):70-8. PubMed ID: 25918584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
    Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne DH, Lee MJ.
    Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan 28; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10650107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of patients with missed common bile duct stones.
    Eissa M, Okasha HH, Abbasy M, Khamis AK, Abdellatef A, Rady MA.
    World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Sep 16; 14(9):564-574. PubMed ID: 36186945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice may miss choledocholithiasis in gallstone pancreatitis.
    Srinivasa S, Sammour T, McEntee B, Davis N, Hill AG.
    Can J Surg; 2010 Dec 16; 53(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 21092433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.