These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
441 related items for PubMed ID: 16941840
1. Influence of anisotropic conductivity on EEG source reconstruction: investigations in a rabbit model. Güllmar D, Haueisen J, Eiselt M, Giessler F, Flemming L, Anwander A, Knösche TR, Wolters CH, Dümpelmann M, Tuch DS, Reichenbach JR. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1841-50. PubMed ID: 16941840 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis. Hallez H, Vanrumste B, Van Hese P, Delputte S, Lemahieu I. Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr 07; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling. Wolters CH, Anwander A, Tricoche X, Weinstein D, Koch MA, MacLeod RS. Neuroimage; 2006 Apr 15; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis. Hallez H, Staelens S, Lemahieu I. Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct 21; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A finite difference method with reciprocity used to incorporate anisotropy in electroencephalogram dipole source localization. Hallez H, Vanrumste B, Van Hese P, D'Asseler Y, Lemahieu I, Van de Walle R. Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug 21; 50(16):3787-806. PubMed ID: 16077227 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head. Abascal JF, Arridge SR, Atkinson D, Horesh R, Fabrizi L, De Lucia M, Horesh L, Bayford RH, Holder DS. Neuroimage; 2008 Nov 01; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry. Gutiérrez D, Nehorai A. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar 01; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models. Van Uitert R, Johnson C, Zhukov L. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec 01; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations. Im CH, Jung HK, Fujimaki N. Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct 21; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays. Gutiérrez D, Nehorai A, Muravchik CH. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec 21; 51(12):2113-22. PubMed ID: 15605858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations. Ramon C, Schimpf PH, Haueisen J. Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb 08; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]