These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

761 related items for PubMed ID: 16946222

  • 1. Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss.
    Caughey AB, Hopkins LM, Norton ME.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):612-6. PubMed ID: 16946222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fetal loss rate after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: an 11-year national registry study.
    Tabor A, Vestergaard CH, Lidegaard Ø.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19504504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The loss rates for invasive prenatal testing in a specialised obstetric ultrasound practice.
    Scott F, Peters H, Boogert T, Robertson R, Anderson J, McLennan A, Kesby G, Edelman D.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Feb; 42(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 11926642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities.
    Rhoads GG, Jackson LG, Schlesselman SE, de la Cruz FF, Desnick RJ, Golbus MS, Ledbetter DH, Lubs HA, Mahoney MJ, Pergament E.
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Mar 09; 320(10):609-17. PubMed ID: 2645520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of pregnancy loss between transcervical and transabdominal chorionic villus sampling.
    Silver RK, MacGregor SN, Muhlbach LH, Kambich MP, Ragin A.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May 09; 83(5 Pt 1):657-60. PubMed ID: 8164920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures 2005.
    Evans MI, Wapner RJ.
    Semin Perinatol; 2005 Aug 09; 29(4):215-8. PubMed ID: 16104671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Infant morbidity following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal karyotyping.
    Cederholm M, Haglund B, Axelsson O.
    BJOG; 2005 Apr 09; 112(4):394-402. PubMed ID: 15777434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Maternal complications following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal karyotyping.
    Cederholm M, Haglund B, Axelsson O.
    BJOG; 2003 Apr 09; 110(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 12699801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 39.