These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1271 related items for PubMed ID: 16946633

  • 1. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Hayes V, Sidiqi F, Dabbah M, Sefter JC, Hu N, Beatson H.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep 01; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Dmitriev A, Hu N, Woo Kim S, Cappuccino A, Pimenta L.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM, Tzermiadianos MN, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Carandang G, Dooris A, Patwardhan AG.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct 15; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK, Kim YE, Wang KC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May 20; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, Hu N, McAfee PC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM, Park C, Lee K, Lee S.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep 15; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA, Auerbach JD, Balderston RA, Kurtz SM.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov 01; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar total disc arthroplasty, discectomy, and fusion: effect on adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force.
    Gao SG, Lei GH, He HB, Liu H, Xiao WF, Wen T, Liang JY, Li KH.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Nov 01; 15(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 21780862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S, Rivera Y, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE.
    Spine J; 2009 Oct 01; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Aryan HE, Newman CB, Lu DC, Hu SS, Tay BK, Bradford DS, Puttlitz CM, Ames CP.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr 01; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
    Cunningham BW, Hu N, Beatson HJ, Serhan H, Sefter JC, McAfee PC.
    Spine J; 2009 Sep 01; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.
    Denozière G, Ku DN.
    J Biomech; 2006 Sep 01; 39(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 16439247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
    Wilke HJ, Schmidt H, Werner K, Schmölz W, Drumm J.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov 15; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA, Bendo JA, Quirno M, Errico T, Goldstein J, Spivak J.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec 01; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
    Phillips FM, Voronov LI, Gaitanis IN, Carandang G, Havey RM, Patwardhan AG.
    Spine J; 2006 Dec 01; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
    Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Heinz-Leisenheimer M, Korge A.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr 01; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Influence of inlay height on motion characteristics of lumbar segments in total disc replacement].
    Weisskopf M, Ohnsorge JA, Martini F, Niethard FU, Birnbaum K.
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2008 Apr 01; 146(4):452-7. PubMed ID: 18704840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of soft tissue properties on spinal flexibility in scoliosis: biomechanical simulation of fulcrum bending.
    Little JP, Adam CJ.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan 15; 34(2):E76-82. PubMed ID: 19139657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Biomechanical analysis of a disc prosthesis distal to a scoliosis model.
    Quirno M, Kamerlink JR, Valdevit A, Kang M, Yaszay B, Duncan N, Boachie-Adjei O, Lonner BS, Errico TJ.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun 15; 34(14):1470-5. PubMed ID: 19525838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics.
    Zhu Q, Larson CR, Sjovold SG, Rosler DM, Keynan O, Wilson DR, Cripton PA, Oxland TR.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan 01; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 64.