These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
242 related items for PubMed ID: 16949896
1. A method for the estimation of femoral bone mineral density from variables of ultrasound transmission through the human femur. Barkmann R, Laugier P, Moser U, Dencks S, Padilla F, Haiat G, Heller M, Glüer CC. Bone; 2007 Jan; 40(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16949896 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of ultrasound and X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements in a case control study of female rheumatoid arthritis patients and randomly selected subjects in the population. Haugeberg G, Ørstavik RE, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, Kvien TK. Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jun; 14(4):312-9. PubMed ID: 12730749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men. Gonnelli S, Cepollaro C, Gennari L, Montagnani A, Caffarelli C, Merlotti D, Rossi S, Cadirni A, Nuti R. Osteoporos Int; 2005 Aug; 16(8):963-8. PubMed ID: 15599495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Wavelet-based signal processing of in vitro ultrasonic measurements at the proximal femur. Dencks S, Barkmann R, Padilla F, Haïat G, Laugier P, Glüer CC. Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 33(6):970-80. PubMed ID: 17445965 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry. He YQ, Fan B, Hans D, Li J, Wu CY, Njeh CF, Zhao S, Lu Y, Tsuda-Futami E, Fuerst T, Genant HK. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Jun; 11(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 10928226 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal prediction of bone mineral density with ultrasonic measurements in excised human femur. Haïat G, Padilla F, Barkmann R, Dencks S, Moser U, Glüer CC, Laugier P. Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Sep; 77(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 16151672 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Does quantitative ultrasound imaging enhance precision and discrimination? Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Sep; 11(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 10912845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination. Njeh CF, Hans D, Li J, Fan B, Fuerst T, He YQ, Tsuda-Futami E, Lu Y, Wu CY, Genant HK. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Sep; 11(12):1051-62. PubMed ID: 11256897 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [X-ray densitometry and ultrasonography of the heel bone--sensitivity and comparison with densitometry of the axial skeleton]. Michalská D, Zikán V, Stĕpán J, Weichetová M, Kubová V, Krenková J, Masatová A. Cas Lek Cesk; 2000 Apr 26; 139(8):231-6. PubMed ID: 10916211 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk. Frediani B, Acciai C, Falsetti P, Baldi F, Filippou G, Siagkri C, Spreafico A, Galeazzi M, Marcolongo R. Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct 26; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the longitudinal changes in quantitative ultrasound with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the four-year effects of hormone replacement therapy. Sahota O, San P, Cawte SA, Pearson D, Hosking DJ. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Oct 26; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 10663359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Femur ultrasound (FemUS)--first clinical results on hip fracture discrimination and estimation of femoral BMD. Barkmann R, Dencks S, Laugier P, Padilla F, Brixen K, Ryg J, Seekamp A, Mahlke L, Bremer A, Heller M, Glüer CC. Osteoporos Int; 2010 Jun 26; 21(6):969-76. PubMed ID: 19693640 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination? Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Osteoporos Int; 2001 Jun 26; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo measurements of ultrasound transmission through the human proximal femur. Barkmann R, Laugier P, Moser U, Dencks S, Klausner M, Padilla F, Haiat G, Heller M, Glüer CC. Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jul 26; 34(7):1186-90. PubMed ID: 18294756 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification. Grampp S, Genant HK, Mathur A, Lang P, Jergas M, Takada M, Glüer CC, Lu Y, Chavez M. J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May 26; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of the strength of the elderly proximal femur by bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements of the heel and tibia. Bouxsein ML, Coan BS, Lee SC. Bone; 1999 Jul 26; 25(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 10423021 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry. El-Desouki MI, Sherafzal MS, Othman SA. Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep 26; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of an imaging heel quantitative ultrasound device (DTU-one) with densitometric and ultrasonic measurements. Diessel E, Fuerst T, Njeh CF, Hans D, Cheng S, Genant HK. Br J Radiol; 2000 Jan 26; 73(865):23-30. PubMed ID: 10721316 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness. Prevrhal S, Fuerst T, Fan B, Njeh C, Hans D, Uffmann M, Srivastav S, Genant HK. Osteoporos Int; 2001 Jan 26; 12(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11305080 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]