These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

651 related items for PubMed ID: 1696017

  • 1. Comparing scores on the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition with the WISC-R for exceptional children.
    Hollinger CL, Baldwin C.
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Jun; 66(3 Pt 1):979-84. PubMed ID: 1696017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition: a small study of concurrent validity.
    Hollinger CL, Baldwin C.
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Jun; 66(3 Pt 2):1331-6. PubMed ID: 2385722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition and the WISC--R for children in the lower range of intelligence.
    Lukens J.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):819-22. PubMed ID: 2377415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. IQ discrepancies between the Binet and WISC-R in children with developmental problems.
    Bloom AS, Reese A, Altshuler L, Meckler CL, Raskin LM.
    J Clin Psychol; 1983 Jul; 39(4):600-3. PubMed ID: 6875001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Assessment of preschoolers at-risk with the WPPSI--R and the Stanford-Binet L-M.
    Gerken KC, Hodapp AF.
    Psychol Rep; 1992 Oct; 71(2):659-64. PubMed ID: 1410125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Relationships between scores on Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence--Revised and Stanford-Binet IV.
    Carvajal HH, Parks JP, Bays KJ, Logan RA, Lujano CI, Page GL, Weaver KA.
    Psychol Rep; 1991 Aug; 69(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 1961799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Correlations between scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III and the General Purpose Abbreviated Battery of the Stanford-Binet IV.
    Carvajal HH, Hayes JE, Lackey KL, Rathke ML, Wiebe DA, Weaver KA.
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Jun; 72(3 Pt 2):1167-70. PubMed ID: 8337322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Intellectual evaluations of children using human figure drawings: an empirical investigation of two methods.
    Abell SC, von Briesen PD, Watz LS.
    J Clin Psychol; 1996 Jan; 52(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 8682914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The assessment of developmentally disabled children with the WISC-R, Binet and other tests.
    Raskin LM, Bloom AS, Klee SH, Reese A.
    J Clin Psychol; 1978 Jan; 34(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 76637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Relationship of scores on PPVT-R and WISC-R with special education children and youth.
    Candler AC, Maddux CD, Johnson DL.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Apr; 62(2):417-8. PubMed ID: 3503246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A validity study of the Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition with students with learning disabilities.
    Smith DK, St Martin ME, Lyon MA.
    J Learn Disabil; 1989 Apr; 22(4):260-1. PubMed ID: 2738463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. External validity of the profile variability index for the K-ABC, Stanford-Binet, and WISC-R: another cul de-sac.
    Kline RB, Snyder J, Guilmette S, Castellanos M.
    J Learn Disabil; 1993 Oct; 26(8):557-67. PubMed ID: 8245701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of Kaufman's short form of the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales--Fourth Edition.
    Karr SK, Carvajal H, Palmer BL.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1120-2. PubMed ID: 1501979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Relationships between scores on Stanford-Binet IV and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised.
    Carvajal H, Weyand K.
    Psychol Rep; 1986 Oct; 59(2 Pt 2):963-6. PubMed ID: 3809352
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Incremental validity of WISC-IV(UK) factor index scores with a referred Irish sample: predicting performance on the WIAT-II(UK.).
    Canivez GL, Watkins MW, James T, Good R, James K.
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2014 Dec; 84(Pt 4):667-84. PubMed ID: 25185753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition short forms with underachieving and learning disabled students.
    Lawson TT, Evans LD.
    Psychol Rep; 1996 Aug; 79(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8873787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reliability and validity of ratio developmental quotients from the Cattell Infant Intelligence Scale.
    Atkinson L.
    Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Sep; 95(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 1699557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Differential validity of the K-ABC for lower functioning preschool children versus those of higher ability.
    Bloom AS, Allard AM, Zelko FA, Brill WJ, Topinka CW, Pfohl W.
    Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Nov; 93(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 3228519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of PPVT-R and WISC-R in a mild/moderate handicapped sample.
    Beck FW, Black FL.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Jun; 62(3):891-4. PubMed ID: 3725526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Construct validity of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children with mildly mentally retarded students.
    Obrzut A, Nelson RB, Obrzut JE.
    Am J Ment Defic; 1987 Jul; 92(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 3618659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.