These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

153 related items for PubMed ID: 16961490

  • 21. Comparison of storm intensity and application timing on modeled transport and fate of six contaminants.
    Chiovarou ED, Siewicki TC.
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jan 15; 389(1):87-100. PubMed ID: 17904201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Dimensionless analysis of two analytical solutions for 3-D solute transport in groundwater.
    Guyonnet D, Neville C.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2004 Nov 15; 75(1-2):141-53. PubMed ID: 15385102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Containment of Sources of Groundwater Contamination: Analysis of Mass Fluxes.
    Neville CJ, Andrews CB.
    Ground Water; 2020 Mar 15; 58(2):183-188. PubMed ID: 31152443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. An innovative modeling approach using Qual2K and HEC-RAS integration to assess the impact of tidal effect on River Water quality simulation.
    Fan C, Ko CH, Wang WS.
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Apr 15; 90(5):1824-32. PubMed ID: 19118937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Assessing impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones: II. Coupling source strength functions to plume evolution.
    Falta RW, Basu N, Rao PS.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Sep 15; 79(1-2):45-66. PubMed ID: 16061307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Well vulnerability: a quantitative approach for source water protection.
    Trotta L.
    Ground Water; 2007 Sep 15; 45(5):529; author reply 530. PubMed ID: 17760578
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Field scale characterization and modeling of contaminant release from a coal tar source zone.
    D'Affonseca FM, Blum P, Finkel M, Melzer R, Grathwohl P.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Nov 14; 102(1-2):120-39. PubMed ID: 18538890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Analysis of groundwater contamination using concentration-time series recorded during an integral pumping test: bias introduced by strong concentration gradients within the plume.
    Zeru A, Schäfer G.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Dec 14; 81(1-4):106-24. PubMed ID: 16216382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Positive solution of two-dimensional solute transport in heterogeneous aquifers.
    Herrera P, Valocchi A.
    Ground Water; 2006 Dec 14; 44(6):803-13. PubMed ID: 17087752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Optimal design of pump-and-treat systems under uncertain hydraulic conductivity and plume distribution.
    Baú DA, Mayer AS.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Aug 20; 100(1-2):30-46. PubMed ID: 18635286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Integral quantification of contaminant mass flow rates in a contaminated aquifer: conditioning of the numerical inversion of concentration-time series.
    Herold M, Ptak T, Bayer-Raich M, Wendel T, Grathwohl P.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr 15; 106(1-2):29-38. PubMed ID: 19167131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Characterisation of a DNAPL source zone in a porous aquifer using the Partitioning Interwell Tracer Test and an inverse modelling approach.
    Dridi L, Pollet I, Razakarisoa O, Schäfer G.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Jun 26; 107(1-2):22-44. PubMed ID: 19395120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Enhanced remedial amendment delivery through fluid viscosity modifications: experiments and numerical simulations.
    Zhong L, Oostrom M, Wietsma TW, Covert MA.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Oct 23; 101(1-4):29-41. PubMed ID: 18786743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Sensitivity analysis of non-point sources in a water quality model applied to a dammed low-flow-reach river.
    Silva NG, von Sperling M.
    Water Sci Technol; 2008 Oct 23; 57(8):1295-300. PubMed ID: 18469404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. TREX: spatially distributed model to assess watershed contaminant transport and fate.
    Velleux ML, England JF, Julien PY.
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Oct 01; 404(1):113-28. PubMed ID: 18649925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effects of reduced contaminant loading on downgradient water quality in an idealized two-layer granular porous media.
    Sale TC, Zimbron JA, Dandy DS.
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Nov 14; 102(1-2):72-85. PubMed ID: 18930336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. An assembly model for simulation of large-scale ground water flow and transport.
    Huang J, Christ JA, Goltz MN.
    Ground Water; 2008 Nov 14; 46(6):882-92. PubMed ID: 18715260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Using analytic element models to delineate drinking water source protection areas.
    Raymond HA, Bondoc M, McGinnis J, Metropulos K, Heider P, Reed A, Saines S.
    Ground Water; 2006 Nov 14; 44(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 16405462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Factors affecting nitrate distribution in shallow groundwater under a beef farm in south eastern Ireland.
    Fenton O, Richards KG, Kirwan L, Khalil MI, Healy MG.
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul 14; 90(10):3135-46. PubMed ID: 19556054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Effect of blood flow on near-the-wall mass transport of drugs and other bioactive agents: a simple formula to estimate boundary layer concentrations.
    Rugonyi S.
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr 14; 130(2):021010. PubMed ID: 18412497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.