These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

180 related items for PubMed ID: 16963101

  • 1. The ageing effect on the bioaccessibility and fractionation of arsenic in soils from China.
    Tang XY, Zhu YG, Shan XQ, McLaren R, Duan J.
    Chemosphere; 2007 Jan; 66(7):1183-90. PubMed ID: 16963101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of ageing on the bioaccessibility and fractionation of cadmium in some typical soils of China.
    Tang XY, Zhu YG, Cui YS, Duan J, Tang L.
    Environ Int; 2006 Jul; 32(5):682-9. PubMed ID: 16616372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The impact of sequestration on the bioaccessibility of arsenic in long-term contaminated soils.
    Smith E, Naidu R, Weber J, Juhasz AL.
    Chemosphere; 2008 Mar; 71(4):773-80. PubMed ID: 18023842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Arsenic bioaccessibility in CCA-contaminated soils: influence of soil properties, arsenic fractionation, and particle-size fraction.
    Girouard E, Zagury GJ.
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Apr 01; 407(8):2576-85. PubMed ID: 19211134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pilot study of temporal variations in lead bioaccessibility and chemical fractionation in some Chinese soils.
    Tang XY, Cui YS, Duan J, Tang L.
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Dec 15; 160(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 18395339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Influence of mercury speciation and fractionation on bioaccessibility in soils.
    Zagury GJ, Bedeaux C, Welfringer B.
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009 Apr 15; 56(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 18704252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Availability and bioaccessibility of metals in fine particles of some urban soils.
    Madrid F, Biasioli M, Ajmone-Marsan F.
    Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2008 Jul 15; 55(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 18058158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Bioaccessible and non-bioaccessible fractions of soil arsenic.
    Whitacre SD, Basta NT, Dayton EA.
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2013 Jul 15; 48(6):620-8. PubMed ID: 23442113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Changes in arsenic fractionation, bioaccessibility and speciation in organo-arsenical pesticide amended soils as a function of soil aging.
    Quazi S, Sarkar D, Datta R.
    Chemosphere; 2011 Sep 15; 84(11):1563-71. PubMed ID: 21722940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of biosolid incorporation on arsenic distribution in Mollisol soils in central Chile.
    Ascar L, Ahumada I, Richter P.
    Chemosphere; 2008 Jan 15; 70(7):1211-7. PubMed ID: 17889255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Impact of soil particle size and bioaccessibility on children and adult lead exposure in peri-urban contaminated soils.
    Juhasz AL, Weber J, Smith E.
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Feb 28; 186(2-3):1870-9. PubMed ID: 21247691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fate and bioavailability of arsenic in organo-arsenical pesticide-applied soils. Part-I: incubation study.
    Sarkar D, Datta R, Sharma S.
    Chemosphere; 2005 Jul 28; 60(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 15914238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. In vitro assessment of arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated (anthropogenic and geogenic) soils.
    Juhasz AL, Smith E, Weber J, Rees M, Rofe A, Kuchel T, Sansom L, Naidu R.
    Chemosphere; 2007 Aug 28; 69(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17532365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Assessment of oral bioaccessibility of arsenic in playground soil in Madrid (Spain): a three-method comparison and implications for risk assessment.
    Mingot J, De Miguel E, Chacón E.
    Chemosphere; 2011 Sep 28; 84(10):1386-91. PubMed ID: 21601908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro methodologies for the assessment of arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils.
    Juhasz AL, Smith E, Weber J, Rees M, Rofe A, Kuchel T, Sansom L, Naidu R.
    Chemosphere; 2007 Oct 28; 69(6):961-6. PubMed ID: 17585998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.