These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

62 related items for PubMed ID: 16967779

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [The experimental and clinical evaluation of digital chest radiography using FCR (Fuji Computed Radiography)].
    Oda J.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Dec 25; 50(12):1485-98. PubMed ID: 2089362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z, Du X, Liu J, Yao X, Yang Y, Li K.
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul 25; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K, Smeets P, De Hauwere A, Voet T, Duyck P, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun 25; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
    Matsumoto M, Sumida I, Ideguchi T, Kawaji Y, Himuro K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Jun 25; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Digitizing and consolidating mammograms and other images for teaching applications.
    Bassignani MJ, LoRusso AP, Harvey JA.
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jun 25; 13(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 16679282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Clinical evaluation of Fuji computed radiography (FCR) by physicians including non-radiologists].
    Akita S, Oda J, Shiina M, Sakai K.
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1990 Apr 25; 35(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 2355649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Artifacts in digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C, Jacobs J, Bosmans H.
    JBR-BTR; 2008 Apr 25; 91(6):262-3. PubMed ID: 19203002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Optimal gradation processing parameter for soft-copy reading of digital mammogram: comparison between the parameter recommended for hard-copy and other parameters.
    Kamitani T, Yabuuchi H, Soeda H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Setoguchi T, Sakai S, Hatakenaka M, Ishii N, Honda H.
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 May 25; 66(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 17659858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Quality assurance (QA) procedures for software: evaluation of an ADC quality system.
    Efstathopoulos EP, Benekos O, Molfetas M, Charou E, Kottou S, Argentos S, Kelekis NL.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 May 25; 117(1-3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16464840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann KP, Wenkel E, Böhner C, Lell M, Dassel MS, Bautz WA.
    Rofo; 2007 May 25; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.