These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

160 related items for PubMed ID: 16971590

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Modeling the retention of rumen boluses for the electronic identification of goats.
    Carné S, Caja G, Ghirardi JJ, Salama AA.
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Feb; 94(2):716-26. PubMed ID: 21257040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Extended field test on the use of visual ear tags and electronic boluses for the identification of different goat breeds in the United States.
    Carné S, Gipson TA, Rovai M, Merkel RC, Caja G.
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jul; 87(7):2419-27. PubMed ID: 19329484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Suitability of electronic mini-boluses for the early identification of goat kids and effects on growth performance and development of the reticulorumen.
    Castro N, Martín D, Castro-Alonso A, Argüello A, Capote J, Caja G.
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3464-9. PubMed ID: 20525934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Readability of visual and electronic leg tags versus rumen boluses and electronic ear tags for the permanent identification of dairy goats.
    Carné S, Caja G, Rojas-Olivares MA, Salama AA.
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5157-66. PubMed ID: 20965331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. In vivo mechanical and in vitro electromagnetic side-effects of a ruminal transponder in cattle.
    Antonini C, Trabalza-Marinucci M, Franceschini R, Mughetti L, Acuti G, Faba A, Asdrubali G, Boiti C.
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Nov; 84(11):3133-42. PubMed ID: 17032809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of visual and electronic identification devices in pigs: on-farm performances.
    Babot D, Hernández-Jover M, Caja G, Santamarina C, Ghirardi JJ.
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2575-81. PubMed ID: 16908663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Traceability of extensively produced Iberian pigs using visual and electronic identification devices from farm to slaughter.
    Gosálvez LF, Santamarina C, Averós X, Hernández-Jover M, Caja G, Babot D.
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2746-52. PubMed ID: 17609464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The development and use of electronic ruminal boluses as a vehicle for bovine identification.
    Fallon RJ.
    Rev Sci Tech; 2001 Aug; 20(2):480-90. PubMed ID: 11548520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Implementing electronic identification for performance recording in sheep: I. Manual versus semiautomatic and automatic recording systems in dairy and meat farms.
    Ait-Saidi A, Caja G, Salama AA, Carné S.
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7505-14. PubMed ID: 25282408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. IDEA: a large-scale project on electronic identification of livestock.
    Ribó O, Korn C, Meloni U, Cropper M, De Winne P, Cuypers M.
    Rev Sci Tech; 2001 Aug; 20(2):426-36. PubMed ID: 11548517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.