These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

151 related items for PubMed ID: 16972011

  • 1. Correlation of PET/CT standardized uptake value measurements between dedicated workstations and a PACS-integrated workstation system.
    Meirelles GS, Kijewski P, Akhurst T.
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 16972011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Prognostic value of the quantitative metabolic volumetric measurement on 18F-FDG PET/CT in Stage IV nonsurgical small-cell lung cancer.
    Liao S, Penney BC, Zhang H, Suzuki K, Pu Y.
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 22142679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Correlation of measurements from diffusion weighted MR imaging and FDG PET/CT in GIST patients: ADC versus SUV.
    Wong CS, Gong N, Chu YC, Anthony MP, Chan Q, Lee HF, Chu KM, Khong PL.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2122-6. PubMed ID: 21955604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of contrast medium enhancement and [(18)F]-FDG uptake of liver metastasis in PET/CT prior to therapy.
    Hundt W, la Fougère C, Vogtmann J, Steinbach S, Burbelko M, Tiling R.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):652-7. PubMed ID: 21300504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Imaging of inflamed and vulnerable plaque in coronary arteries with 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suppression of myocardial uptake using a low-carbohydrate, high-fat preparation.
    Wykrzykowska J, Lehman S, Williams G, Parker JA, Palmer MR, Varkey S, Kolodny G, Laham R.
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Apr; 50(4):563-8. PubMed ID: 19289431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues.
    Paquet N, Albert A, Foidart J, Hustinx R.
    J Nucl Med; 2004 May; 45(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 15136627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Analysis of FDG uptake with hybrid PET using standardised uptake values.
    Zimny M, Kaiser HJ, Wildberger J, Nowak B, Cremerius U, Sabri O, Buell U.
    Eur J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 28(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 11383863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Role of Optimal Quantification of FDG PET Imaging in the Clinical Practice of Radiology.
    Ziai P, Hayeri MR, Salei A, Salavati A, Houshmand S, Alavi A, Teytelboym OM.
    Radiographics; 2016 May; 36(2):481-96. PubMed ID: 26963458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of standardized uptake value measurements in non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Marom EM, Munden RF, Truong MT, Gladish GW, Podoloff DA, Mawlawi O, Broemeling LD, Bruzzi JF, Macapinlac HA.
    J Thorac Imaging; 2006 Aug; 21(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 16915065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.