These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Modulation of the electrophysiological correlates of retrieval cue processing by the specificity of task demands. Johnson JD, Rugg MD. Brain Res; 2006 Feb 03; 1071(1):153-64. PubMed ID: 16413511 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection. Herron JE, Rugg MD. J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug 15; 15(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 14511537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural correlates of differential retrieval orientation: Sustained and item-related components. Woodruff CC, Uncapher MR, Rugg MD. Neuropsychologia; 2006 Aug 15; 44(14):3000-10. PubMed ID: 16930636 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The control of memory retrieval: insights from event-related potentials. Werkle-Bergner M, Mecklinger A, Kray J, Meyer P, Düzel E. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug 15; 24(3):599-614. PubMed ID: 16099369 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of age on retrieval cue processing as revealed by ERPs. Morcom AM, Rugg MD. Neuropsychologia; 2004 Aug 15; 42(11):1525-42. PubMed ID: 15246290 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between study processing and the effects of cue congruency at retrieval: fMRI support for transfer appropriate processing. Park H, Rugg MD. Cereb Cortex; 2008 Apr 15; 18(4):868-75. PubMed ID: 17652467 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Adapting to changing memory retrieval demands: evidence from event-related potentials. Benoit RG, Werkle-Bergner M, Mecklinger A, Kray J. Brain Cogn; 2009 Jun 15; 70(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 19254820 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting. Mecklinger A, Parra M, Waldhauser GT. Brain Res; 2009 Feb 19; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Contribution of familiarity and recollection to associative recognition memory: insights from event-related potentials. Opitz B, Cornell S. J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep 19; 18(9):1595-605. PubMed ID: 16989559 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Late onset of anterior prefrontal activity during true and false recognition: an event-related fMRI study. Schacter DL, Buckner RL, Koutstaal W, Dale AM, Rosen BR. Neuroimage; 1997 Nov 19; 6(4):259-69. PubMed ID: 9417969 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Distinguishing source memory and item memory: brain potentials at encoding and retrieval. Guo C, Duan L, Li W, Paller KA. Brain Res; 2006 Nov 06; 1118(1):142-54. PubMed ID: 16978588 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Content-specificity of the neural correlates of recollection. Woodruff CC, Johnson JD, Uncapher MR, Rugg MD. Neuropsychologia; 2005 Nov 06; 43(7):1022-32. PubMed ID: 15769488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Study-test congruency affects encoding-related brain activity for some but not all stimulus materials. Bauch EM, Otten LJ. J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Jan 06; 24(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 21671740 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Directed forgetting in direct and indirect tests of memory: seeking evidence of retrieval inhibition using electrophysiological measures. Van Hooff JC, Whitaker TA, Ford RM. Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov 06; 71(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 19556048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]