These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 16997595

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Definition of maximum permissible errors for major physical parameters affecting the result of microplate ABO-RH1 blood grouping].
    Bouix O, Sanchez P, Reifenberg JM.
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2007 Aug; 14(3):348-51. PubMed ID: 17482497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [ID and Bio Vue systems--comparison of two systems for the typing of erythrocyte antibodies].
    Eichler H, Klinge U, Kretschmer V.
    Beitr Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1994 Aug; 32():149-52. PubMed ID: 9480072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Guidelines for microplate techniques in liquid-phase blood grouping and antibody screening. A Joint Publication of the British Society for Haematology and the British Blood Transfusion Society. BCSH Blood Transfusion Task Force.
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1990 Aug; 12(4):437-60. PubMed ID: 2127909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Recommendations for evaluation, validation and implementation of new techniques for blood grouping, antibody screening and cross-matching. British Committee for Standards in Haematology, Blood Transfusion Task Force.
    Transfus Med; 1995 Jun; 5(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 7655579
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [The gel centrifugation test: comparison of antibody identification at 37 degrees C with antibody identification at room temperature].
    Hitzler WE, Ulrich M, Däumer C, Beeser H.
    Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1993 Jun; 20 Suppl 2():61-3. PubMed ID: 8374292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Automation of the immunohematology laboratory].
    Delamaire M.
    Transfus Clin Biol; 2005 Jun; 12(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 15914061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The suitability of hemolyzed specimens for compatibility testing using automated technology.
    Laga A, Cheves T, Maroto S, Coutts M, Sweeney J.
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1713-20. PubMed ID: 18482191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A microplate method for reverse ABO typing of bloodstains.
    Mudd JL.
    J Forensic Sci; 1986 Apr; 31(2):418-25. PubMed ID: 3711823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of immunohematologic routine methods using the new erythrocyte-magnetized technology on the QWALYS 2 system.
    Schoenfeld H, Bulling K, von Heymann C, Neuner B, Kalus U, Kiesewetter H, Pruss A.
    Transfusion; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1347-52. PubMed ID: 19389030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Automated blood grouping by gel technology.
    Parker PI, Scott Y, McArdle B, Wallis JP.
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1995 Dec; 52(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 8555780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.