These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
290 related items for PubMed ID: 17000263
1. Occiput posterior fetal head position: not just vacuum assisted deliveries but primary prevention. Londero AP, Strolego F, Londero F. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Oct; 195(4):1191-2; author reply 1192-3. PubMed ID: 17000263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries. Wu JM, Williams KS, Hundley AF, Connolly A, Visco AG. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 193(2):525-8; discussion 528-9. PubMed ID: 16098883 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries. Benavides L, Wu JM, Hundley AF, Ivester TS, Visco AG. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. de Leeuw JW, de Wit C, Kuijken JP, Bruinse HW. BJOG; 2008 Jan; 115(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 17999693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of mediolateral episiotomy during labour: analysis of risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears. Aukee P, Sundström H, Kairaluoma MV. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006 Jan; 85(7):856-60. PubMed ID: 16817086 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury. Damron DP, Capeless EL. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):907-10. PubMed ID: 15467563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Defining an at-risk population for obstetric anal sphincter laceration. Minaglia SM, Kimata C, Soules KA, Pappas T, Oyama IA. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):526.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19762002 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of the soft, silicone obstetric vacuum cup for delivery of the fetal head at cesarean section. Pelosi MA, Apuzzio J. J Reprod Med; 1984 Apr 01; 29(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 6716375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effects of persistent occiput posterior presentation on mode of delivery]. Gardberg M, Tuppurainen M. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1994 Aug 01; 198(4):117-9. PubMed ID: 7975796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Maternal and fetal prognosis of occipito-posterior presentation]. Riethmuller D, Teffaud O, Eyraud JL, Sautière JL, Schaal JP, Maillet R. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1999 Feb 01; 28(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 10394515 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple sonographic finding is associated with a successful vacuum application: the fetal occiput or forehead sign. Bellussi F, Salsi G, Simonazzi G, Youssef A, Cataneo I, Cariello L, Ghi T, Pilu G. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2019 May 01; 1(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 33345820 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The fetal occiput posterior position: state of the science and a new perspective. Simkin P. Birth; 2010 Mar 01; 37(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 20402724 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]