These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

468 related items for PubMed ID: 17011959

  • 1. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.
    Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Gabriel P, Pfeiffer N, Dick HB.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17011959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.
    Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Thieme H, Dick HB.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 20117707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Alió J, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Galal A, Ramzy M.
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 16183129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Kahraman G, Amon M, Franz C, Prinz A, Abela-Formanek C.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery.
    Dosso AA, Cottet L, Burgener ND, Di Nardo S.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18242455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M, Supady E, Piotr L, Synder A, Palenga-Pydyn D, Omulecki W.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19683153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Contrast sensitivity after implantation of a spherical versus an aspherical intraocular lens in biaxial microincision cataract surgery.
    Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Thieme H, Dick HB.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 17321388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M, Supady E, Loba P, Synder A, Palenga-Pydyn D, Omulecki W.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1570-4. PubMed ID: 19683154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Postoperative corneal shape changes: microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery.
    Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Hayashi H.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 19185236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery. One-year follow-up.
    Crema AS, Walsh A, Yamane Y, Nosé W.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1014-8. PubMed ID: 17531696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Coaxial, microcoaxial, and biaxial microincision cataract surgery: prospective comparative study.
    Can I, Takmaz T, Yildiz Y, Bayhan HA, Soyugelen G, Bostanci B.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):740-6. PubMed ID: 20457364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification compared with manual small-incision cataract surgery by a randomized controlled clinical trial: six-week results.
    Gogate PM, Kulkarni SR, Krishnaiah S, Deshpande RD, Joshi SA, Palimkar A, Deshpande MD.
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):869-74. PubMed ID: 15878068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract.
    Kim EC, Byun YS, Kim MS.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 21839609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bimanual microphacoemulsification versus coaxial miniphacoemulsification: prospective study.
    Cavallini GM, Campi L, Masini C, Pelloni S, Pupino A.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 17321387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Surgically induced astigmatism after phacoemulsification in eyes with mild to moderate corneal astigmatism: temporal versus on-axis clear corneal incisions.
    Borasio E, Mehta JS, Maurino V.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):565-72. PubMed ID: 16698473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intraindividual comparative study of corneal and ocular wavefront aberrations after biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery.
    Denoyer A, Denoyer L, Marotte D, Georget M, Pisella PJ.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 92(12):1679-84. PubMed ID: 18757472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Controlled clinical trial comparing biaxial microincision with coaxial small incision for cataract surgery.
    Dick HB.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012 Dec; 22(5):739-50. PubMed ID: 22267455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and standard phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm incision.
    Wilczynski M, Supady E, Loba P, Synder A, Palenga-Pydyn D, Omulecki W.
    Klin Oczna; 2011 Dec; 113(10-12):314-20. PubMed ID: 22384647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Corneal incision quality: microincision cataract surgery versus microcoaxial phacoemulsification.
    Elkady B, Piñero D, Alió JL.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):466-74. PubMed ID: 19251139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.
    Lee KM, Kwon HG, Joo CK.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 19393887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.