These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


199 related items for PubMed ID: 17011963

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications.
    Ghadhfan F, Al-Rajhi A, Wagoner MD.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2041-8. PubMed ID: 18053901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. LASEK and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: clinical and confocal microscopy comparison.
    Ghirlando A, Gambato C, Midena E.
    J Refract Surg; 2007 Sep; 23(7):694-702. PubMed ID: 17912939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The U.S. Army Surface Ablation Study: comparison of PRK, MMC-PRK, and LASEK in moderate to high myopia.
    Sia RK, Ryan DS, Edwards JD, Stutzman RD, Bower KS.
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 30(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 24702577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A randomized prospective clinical trial comparing laser subepithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.
    Pirouzian A, Thornton JA, Ngo S.
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan; 122(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 14718288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Photorefractive keratectomy and butterfly laser epithelial keratomileusis: a prospective, contralateral study.
    Ghanem VC, Kara-José N, Ghanem RC, Coral SA.
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Sep; 24(7):671-84. PubMed ID: 18811109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Rehabilitation time after simultaneous bilateral photorefractive keratectomy for low to moderate myopia.
    Zadok D, Barkana Y, Levy Y, Avizemer H.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 16516789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. PRK and butterfly LASEK: prospective, randomized, contralateral eye comparison of epithelial healing and ocular discomfort.
    Ghanem VC, Souza GC, Souza DC, Viese JM, Weber SL, Kara-José N.
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Jun; 24(6):591-9. PubMed ID: 18581784
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.
    Teus MA, de Benito-Llopis L, García-González M.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). The limits of our knowledge].
    Epstein D.
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Aug; 92(4):385-8. PubMed ID: 7549316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Pain, wound healing and refractive comparison of mechanical and transepithelial debridement in photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: results of 1 year follow-up.
    Celik U, Bozkurt E, Celik B, Demirok A, Yilmaz OF.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Dec; 37(6):420-6. PubMed ID: 25081522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.