These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

285 related items for PubMed ID: 17034926

  • 1. Class II composite restorations with metallic and translucent matrices: 2-year follow-up findings.
    Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Lima FG, Donassollo TA, André Dde A, Leida FL.
    J Dent; 2007 Mar; 35(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 17034926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. One-year comparison of metallic and translucent matrices in Class II composite resin restorations.
    Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Pereira CL, Lund RG, de Carvalho RM.
    Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 17380807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH, Klein-Júnior CA, Camargo JC, Beskow T, Balestrin MD, Demarco FF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar 01; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results.
    Bottenberg P, Alaerts M, Keulemans F.
    J Dent; 2007 Feb 01; 35(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 16963171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems.
    Cenci MS, Lund RG, Pereira CL, de Carvalho RM, Demarco FF.
    J Adhes Dent; 2006 Apr 01; 8(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 16708725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of metallic or translucent matrices for Class II composite restorations: 4-year clinical follow-up findings.
    Demarco FF, Pereira-Cenci T, de Almeida André D, de Sousa Barbosa RP, Piva E, Cenci MS.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Feb 01; 15(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 20049495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded class II resin composite restorations.
    Müllejans R, Badawi MO, Raab WH, Lang H.
    Oper Dent; 2003 Feb 01; 28(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 12670066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.
    Shi L, Wang X, Zhao Q, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Ren Y, Chen Z.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Feb 01; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20166406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage composite in posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Baracco B, Perdigão J, Cabrera E, Giráldez I, Ceballos L.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Feb 01; 37(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 22313275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Feb 01; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG, Dib A, Brackett WW, Estrada BE, Reyes AA.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Feb 01; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW.
    J Dent; 2010 Jun 01; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Efficacy of composites filled with nanoparticles in permanent molars: Six-month results.
    Andrade AK, Duarte RM, Silva FD, Batista AU, Lima KC, Pontual ML, Montes MA.
    Gen Dent; 2010 Jun 01; 58(5):e190-5. PubMed ID: 20829151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
    Krämer N, García-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb 01; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.