These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. Angelieri F, de Almeida RR, Janson G, Castanha Henriques JF, Pinzan A. Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):572-9. PubMed ID: 19054813 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible? Strahm C, De Sousa AP, Grobéty D, Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S. Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with a Cervical-Pull Headgear: A Case Report. Shah AH. Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016 Aug; 27(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 27319037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial. Bondemark L, Karlsson I. Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 16279817 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The effects of the pendulum distalising appliance and cervical headgear on the dentofacial structures. Toy E, Enacar A. Aust Orthod J; 2011 May; 27(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 21696108 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Cephalometric analysis of molar and anterior tooth movement during cervical headgear treatment in relation to growth patterns. Godt A, Berneburg M, Kalwitzki M, Göz G. J Orofac Orthop; 2008 May; 69(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 18506404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation. Caldwell SF, Hymas TA, Timm TA. Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 2--Dentoalveolar changes. Derringer K. Br J Orthod; 1990 May; 17(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 2357464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the "myth" of posterior mandibular rotation. Haralabakis NB, Sifakakis IB. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 15356494 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of two maxillary molar distalizing appliances with the distal jet. Ferguson DJ, Carano A, Bowman SJ, Davis EC, Gutierrez Vega ME, Lee SH. World J Orthod; 2005 Sep; 6(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 16379210 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Study of the structural compensation of the mandible during treatment with cervical headgear]. Işcan HN, Dinçer M, Gültan AS. Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):287-98. PubMed ID: 2489161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]