These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

503 related items for PubMed ID: 17047264

  • 21. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H, Persliden J.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. An investigation of automatic exposure control calibration for chest imaging with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS, Wood TJ, Avery G, Balcam S, Needler L, Beavis AW, Saunderson JR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 May 07; 59(9):2307-24. PubMed ID: 24732020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Physical imaging properties of a flat panel X-ray detector system].
    Yoshida A, Nakamura S, Nishihara S, Kohama C, Takahata A, Fujikawa K.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 May 07; 22(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 12766270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
    Fauber TL.
    Radiol Technol; 2009 May 07; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct 07; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Doses under automatic exposure control (AEC) for direct digital radiographic (DDR) X-ray systems.
    Bowden L, Faulkner R, Clancy C, Gallagher A, Devine M, Gorman D, O'Reilly G, Dowling A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep 07; 147(1-2):210-4. PubMed ID: 21937592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM, Ordiales JM, Guibelalde E, Prieto C, Vano E.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Sep 07; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Sensitivity S of film-screen systems and mode of operation of different automatic exposure systems in general practice conditions. II: Automatic exposure systems].
    Blendl C, Kondmann M, Müller J.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Nov 07; 7(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 9467029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR, Davies AG, Kengyelics SM.
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec 07; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
    Sandilos P, Antypas C, Paraskevopoulou C, Kouvaris J, Vlachos L.
    Technol Health Care; 2006 Dec 07; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann KP, Wenkel E, Böhner C, Lell M, Dassel MS, Bautz WA.
    Rofo; 2007 May 07; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Evaluation and testing of computed radiography systems.
    Charnock P, Connolly PA, Hughes D, Moores BM.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 May 07; 114(1-3):201-7. PubMed ID: 15933109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P, Gutierrez D, Bulling S, Lepori D, Valley JF, Verdun FR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun 07; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.