These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

244 related items for PubMed ID: 17056173

  • 1. Temporal grouping affects the automatic processing of deviant sounds.
    Müller D, Schröger E.
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Mar; 74(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17056173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mismatch negativity in dichotic listening: evidence for interhemispheric differences and multiple generators.
    Deouell LY, Bentin S, Giard MH.
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jul; 35(4):355-65. PubMed ID: 9643050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Auditory streaming affects the processing of successive deviant and standard sounds.
    Müller D, Widmann A, Schröger E.
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Nov; 42(6):668-76. PubMed ID: 16364062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 17; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Novitski N, Alho K, Korzyukov O, Carlson S, Martinkauppi S, Escera C, Rinne T, Aronen HJ, Näätänen R.
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul 17; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Mismatch negativity in children and adults, and effects of an attended task.
    Gomes H, Molholm S, Ritter W, Kurtzberg D, Cowan N, Vaughan HG.
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Nov 17; 37(6):807-16. PubMed ID: 11117461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Visual cues release the temporal coherence of auditory objects in auditory scene analysis.
    Rahne T, Böckmann-Barthel M.
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec 01; 1300():125-34. PubMed ID: 19747455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Preperceptual human number sense for sequential sounds, as revealed by mismatch negativity brain response?
    Ruusuvirta T, Huotilainen M, Näätänen R.
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Dec 01; 17(12):2777-9. PubMed ID: 17317679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The processing of sound duration after left hemisphere stroke: event-related potential and behavioral evidence.
    Ilvonen TM, Kujala T, Tervaniemi M, Salonen O, Näätänen R, Pekkonen E.
    Psychophysiology; 2001 Jul 01; 38(4):622-8. PubMed ID: 11446575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA, Lister JJ, Frisch SA.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug 01; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pre-attentive spectro-temporal feature processing in the human auditory system.
    Zaehle T, Jancke L, Herrmann CS, Meyer M.
    Brain Topogr; 2009 Sep 01; 22(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 19266276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Differential processing of terminal tone parts within structured and non-structured tones.
    Weise A, Müller D, Grimm S, Rübsamen R, Schröger E.
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jun 27; 421(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 17570584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Changes in emotional tone and instrumental timbre are reflected by the mismatch negativity.
    Goydke KN, Altenmüller E, Möller J, Münte TF.
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Nov 27; 21(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 15511651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Automatic change detection: does the auditory system use representations of individual stimulus features or gestalts?
    Deacon D, Nousak JM, Pilotti M, Ritter W, Yang CM.
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Jul 27; 35(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 9643055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The processing of frequency deviations within sounds: evidence for the predictive nature of the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) system.
    Grimm S, Schröger E.
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007 Jul 27; 25(3-4):241-9. PubMed ID: 17943002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ, Cao KL, Wei CG, Liu YZ.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec 05; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Variable cerebral responses to equally distinct deviance in four auditory dimensions: a mismatch negativity study.
    Deouell LY, Bentin S.
    Psychophysiology; 1998 Nov 05; 35(6):745-54. PubMed ID: 9844436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Maturation of cortical mismatch responses to occasional pitch change in early infancy: effects of presentation rate and magnitude of change.
    He C, Hotson L, Trainor LJ.
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan 05; 47(1):218-29. PubMed ID: 18722392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Mismatch negativity and frequency representational width in children with specific language impairment.
    Ahmmed AU, Clarke EM, Adams C.
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2008 Dec 05; 50(12):938-44. PubMed ID: 18808425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Is the failure to detect stimulus deviance during sleep due to a rapid fading of sensory memory or a degradation of stimulus encoding?
    Sabri M, Campbell KB.
    J Sleep Res; 2005 Jun 05; 14(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 15910509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.