These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

211 related items for PubMed ID: 17062500

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S, Hirschfelder A, Scheiber C, Olze H.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A, Gräbel S, Olze H.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
    Xi X, Hong MD, Han DY, Huang DL, Yang WY.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
    Gordin A, Papsin B, Gordon K.
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Morita T, Naito Y, Hirai T, Yamaguchi S, Ito J.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Feb; 260(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12582781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldán C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B, Cao KL, Wang Y, Lu Y.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups.
    Greisiger R, Shallop JK, Hol PK, Elle OJ, Jablonski GE.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16 Suppl 4():1-19. PubMed ID: 26642899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.
    Botros A, van Dijk B, Killian M.
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16920343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P, Arauz SL, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Caversaccio M, Chester-Browne R, Estienne P, Gavilan J, Godey B, Gstöttner W, Han D, Hagen R, Kompis M, Kuzovkov V, Lassaletta L, Lefevre F, Li Y, Müller J, Parnes L, Kleine Punte A, Raine C, Rajan G, Rivas A, Rivas JA, Royle N, Sprinzl G, Stephan K, Walkowiak A, Yanov Y, Zimmermann K, Zorowka P, Skarzynski H.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy: outcomes and rationale.
    Jeong SW, Kim LS, Kim BY, Bae WY, Kim JR.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Oct; (558):36-43. PubMed ID: 17882568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparing cochlear implant users' speech performance with processor fittings based on conventionally determined T and C levels or on compound action potential thresholds and live-voice speech in a prospective balanced crossover study.
    Willeboer C, Smoorenburg GF.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 17086087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM, Said NM.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA, Battmer RD, Pesch J.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.