These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

377 related items for PubMed ID: 17069325

  • 1. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL, Festen JM, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2295-311. PubMed ID: 17069325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.
    Hall JW, Buss E, Grose JH, Roush PA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Oct; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V, Makashay MJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW, Walden TC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG, Summers V, Grassi E, Grant KW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception.
    Lorenzi C, Husson M, Ardoint M, Debruille X.
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):487-95. PubMed ID: 17005491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.
    Jin SH, Nelson PB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3097-108. PubMed ID: 16708964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Kidd G.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
    Bacon SP, Opie JM, Montoya DY.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 41(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 9638921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM, Plomp R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V, Molis MR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.
    Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):342-59. PubMed ID: 20649229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Jul; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
    Christiansen C, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J, Wang Y, Yoho SE, Wang D, Healy EW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of Audibility and Suprathreshold Deficits on Speech Recognition for Listeners With Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Bost TJM, Versfeld NJ, Goverts ST.
    Ear Hear; 2019 May; 40(4):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 31242137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Measuring the threshold for speech reception by adaptive variation of the signal bandwidth. II. Hearing-impaired listeners.
    Noordhoek IM, Houtgast T, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1685-96. PubMed ID: 10738821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of presentation level and compression characteristics on sentence recognition in modulated noise.
    Olsen HL, Olofsson A, Hagerman B.
    Int J Audiol; 2004 May; 43(5):283-94. PubMed ID: 15357412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.