These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
311 related items for PubMed ID: 17074041
1. Improved outcome of facial nerve repair in rats is associated with enhanced regenerative response of motoneurons and augmented neocortical plasticity. Peeva GP, Angelova SK, Guntinas-Lichius O, Streppel M, Irintchev A, Schütz U, Popratiloff A, Savaskan NE, Bräuer AU, Alvanou A, Nitsch R, Angelov DN. Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 24(8):2152-62. PubMed ID: 17074041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Local stabilization of microtubule assembly improves recovery of facial nerve function after repair. Grosheva M, Guntinas-Lichius O, Angelova SK, Kuerten S, Alvanou A, Streppel M, Skouras E, Sinis N, Pavlov S, Angelov DN. Exp Neurol; 2008 Jan; 209(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 17963754 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of platelet rich plasma and fibrin sealant on facial nerve regeneration in a rat model. Farrag TY, Lehar M, Verhaegen P, Carson KA, Byrne PJ. Laryngoscope; 2007 Jan; 117(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 17202946 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Manually-stimulated recovery of motor function after facial nerve injury requires intact sensory input. Pavlov SP, Grosheva M, Streppel M, Guntinas-Lichius O, Irintchev A, Skouras E, Angelova SK, Kuerten S, Sinis N, Dunlop SA, Angelov DN. Exp Neurol; 2008 May; 211(1):292-300. PubMed ID: 18381213 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Putative roles of soluble trophic factors in facial nerve regeneration, target reinnervation, and recovery of vibrissal whisking. Bendella H, Rink S, Grosheva M, Sarikcioglu L, Gordon T, Angelov DN. Exp Neurol; 2018 Feb; 300():100-110. PubMed ID: 29104116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Recovery of whisking function promoted by manual stimulation of the vibrissal muscles after facial nerve injury requires insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Kiryakova S, Söhnchen J, Grosheva M, Schuetz U, Marinova Ts, Dzhupanova R, Sinis N, Hübbers CU, Skouras E, Ankerne J, Fries JW, Irintchev A, Dunlop SA, Angelov DN. Exp Neurol; 2010 Apr; 222(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20067789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The facial motor nucleus transcriptional program in response to peripheral nerve injury identifies Hn1 as a regeneration-associated gene. Zujovic V, Luo D, Baker HV, Lopez MC, Miller KR, Streit WJ, Harrison JK. J Neurosci Res; 2005 Dec 01; 82(5):581-91. PubMed ID: 16267826 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative, morphological, and somatotopic nuclear changes after facial nerve regeneration in adult rats: a possible challenge to the "no new neurons" dogma. Fernandez E, Pallini R, Marchese E, Lauretti L, La Marca F. Neurosurgery; 1995 Sep 01; 37(3):456-62; discussion 462-3. PubMed ID: 7501110 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Recovery of original nerve supply after hypoglossal-facial anastomosis causes permanent motor hyperinnervation of the whisker-pad muscles in the rat. Angelov DN, Gunkel A, Stennert E, Neiss WF. J Comp Neurol; 1993 Dec 08; 338(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 8308168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Altered sensory input improves the accuracy of muscle reinnervation. Skouras E, Popratiloff A, Guntinas-Lichius O, Streppel M, Rehm KE, Neiss WF, Angelov DN. Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2002 Dec 08; 20(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 12237492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors limiting motor recovery after facial nerve transection in the rat: combined structural and functional analyses. Guntinas-Lichius O, Irintchev A, Streppel M, Lenzen M, Grosheva M, Wewetzer K, Neiss WF, Angelov DN. Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Jan 08; 21(2):391-402. PubMed ID: 15673438 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Manual stimulation of the suprahyoid-sublingual region diminishes polynnervation of the motor endplates and improves recovery of function after hypoglossal nerve injury in rats. Evgenieva E, Schweigert P, Guntinas-Lichius O, Pavlov S, Grosheva M, Angelova S, Streppel M, Irintchev A, Skouras E, Kuerten S, Sinis N, Dunlop S, Radeva V, Angelov DN. Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008 Jan 08; 22(6):754-68. PubMed ID: 18612142 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Opposite impacts of tenascin-C and tenascin-R deficiency in mice on the functional outcome of facial nerve repair. Guntinas-Lichius O, Angelov DN, Morellini F, Lenzen M, Skouras E, Schachner M, Irintchev A. Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Nov 08; 22(9):2171-9. PubMed ID: 16262655 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Stimulation of trigeminal afferents improves motor recovery after facial nerve injury: functional, electrophysiological and morphological proofs. Skouras E, Pavlov S, Bendella H, Angelov DN. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol; 2013 Nov 08; 213():1-105, vii. PubMed ID: 23322155 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Facial nerve injury induces facilitation of responses in both trigeminal and facial nuclei of rat. Kis Z, Rákos G, Farkas T, Horváth S, Toldi J. Neurosci Lett; 2004 Apr 01; 358(3):223-5. PubMed ID: 15039121 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The facial "motor" nerve of the rat: control of vibrissal movement and examination of motor and sensory components. Semba K, Egger MD. J Comp Neurol; 1986 May 08; 247(2):144-58. PubMed ID: 3722437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The minimum number of facial motor neurons essential for minimal whisker movement in neonatally nerve-transected young adult rats. Higashiyama F, Fukushima N, Yokouchi K, Kawagishi K, Moriizumi T. J Neurosurg; 2005 May 08; 102(4 Suppl):390-5. PubMed ID: 15926390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]