These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

109 related items for PubMed ID: 17076516

  • 1. Comparison of glass and plastic blood collection tubes.
    Tetrault GA.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Nov; 130(11):1600; author reply 1600. PubMed ID: 17076516
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinically relevant differences in prothrombin time and INR values related to blood sample collection in plastic vs glass tubes.
    Fiebig EW, Etzell JE, Ng VL.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Dec; 124(6):902-9. PubMed ID: 16416740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of samples obtained from 3.2% sodium citrate glass and two 3.2% sodium citrate plastic blood collection tubes used in coagulation testing.
    Gosselin RC, Janatpour K, Larkin EC, Lee YP, Owings JT.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Dec; 122(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 15539376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of blood collection in plastic vs. glass evacuated serum-separator tubes on hormone and tumour marker levels.
    Smets EM, Dijkstra-Lagemaat JE, Blankenstein MA.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004 Apr; 42(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 15147155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A comparison of glass and plastic blood collection tubes for routine and specialized coagulation assays: a comprehensive study.
    Kratz A, Stanganelli N, Van Cott EM.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Jan; 130(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 16390236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of plastic vs. glass evacuated serum-separator (SST) blood-drawing tubes for common clinical chemistry determinations.
    Hill BM, Laessig RH, Koch DD, Hassemer DJ.
    Clin Chem; 1992 Aug; 38(8 Pt 1):1474-8. PubMed ID: 1643717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Stability of therapeutic drug measurement in specimens collected in VACUTAINER plastic blood-collection tubes.
    Dasgupta A, Blackwell W, Bard D.
    Ther Drug Monit; 1996 Jun; 18(3):306-9. PubMed ID: 8738774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Use of plastic vacutainer tubes for quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in blood specimens.
    Landry ML, Garner R, Ferguson D.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jan; 39(1):354-6. PubMed ID: 11136799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A new plastic collection tube made of polyethylene terephtalate is suitable for monitoring traditional anticoagulant therapy (oral anticoagulant, unfractionated heparin, and low molecular weight heparin).
    Toulon P, Ajzenberg N, Smahi M, Guillin MC.
    Thromb Res; 2007 Jan; 119(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 16426667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison between siliconized evacuated glass and plastic blood collection tubes for prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time assay in normal patients, patients on oral anticoagulant therapy and patients with unfractioned heparin therapy.
    D'Angelo G, Villa C.
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2011 Apr; 33(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 20979595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A new plastic evacuated tube with plasma separator.
    Landt M, Wilhite TR, Smith CH.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 1995 Apr; 9(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 7714661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of ethanol and other drugs of abuse concentrations in whole blood stored in venoject glass and plastic and venosafe plastic evacuated tubes.
    Karinen R, Oiestad EL, Andresen W, Wethe G, Smith-Kielland A, Christophersen A.
    J Anal Toxicol; 2010 Sep; 34(7):420-8. PubMed ID: 20822681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Hybrid Blood Collection Tubes: Combining the Best Attributes of Glass and Plastic for Safety and Shelf life.
    Weikart CM, Breeland AP, Wills MS, Baltazar-Lopez ME.
    SLAS Technol; 2020 Oct; 25(5):484-493. PubMed ID: 32425131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Inappropriate statistics in coagulation collection tube comparison study.
    Tetrault GA.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jul; 124(1):155; author reply 155-6. PubMed ID: 16086504
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of glass K3EDTA versus plastic K2EDTA blood-drawing tubes for complete blood counts, reticulocyte counts, and white blood cell differentials.
    Van Cott EM, Lewandrowski KB, Patel S, Grzybek DY, Patel HS, Fletcher SR, Kratz A.
    Lab Hematol; 2003 Jul; 9(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12661823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Plastic collection tubes decrease risk of employee injury.
    Ernst DJ.
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 May; 33(5):44-6, 48, 50. PubMed ID: 11373814
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Suggestions for an appropriate methodological approach for the validation of an evacuated blood collection tube made in plastic material including the effect of age.
    Foucher K, Toulon P, Schved JF, Polack B.
    Thromb Haemost; 2004 Apr; 91(4):845-7. PubMed ID: 15045160
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Suitability of plastic collection tubes for cyclosporine measurements.
    Faynor SM, Robinson R.
    Clin Chem; 1998 Oct; 44(10):2220-1. PubMed ID: 9761269
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.