These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

304 related items for PubMed ID: 17081712

  • 41. Sound level-dependent growth of N1m amplitude with low and high-frequency tones.
    Soeta Y, Nakagawa S.
    Neuroreport; 2009 Apr 22; 20(6):548-52. PubMed ID: 19319005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Left hemisphere specialization for rapid temporal processing: a study with auditory 40 Hz steady-state responses.
    Yamasaki T, Goto Y, Taniwaki T, Kinukawa N, Kira J, Tobimatsu S.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Feb 22; 116(2):393-400. PubMed ID: 15661117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Dynamic movement of N100m current sources in auditory evoked fields: comparison of ipsilateral versus contralateral responses in human auditory cortex.
    Jin CY, Ozaki I, Suzuki Y, Baba M, Hashimoto I.
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Apr 22; 60(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 18276027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Auditory temporal resolution in children assessed by magnetoencephalography.
    Diedler J, Pietz J, Bast T, Rupp A.
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct 29; 18(16):1691-5. PubMed ID: 17921870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Inhibition of auditory cortical responses to ipsilateral stimuli during dichotic listening: evidence from magnetoencephalography.
    Brancucci A, Babiloni C, Babiloni F, Galderisi S, Mucci A, Tecchio F, Zappasodi F, Pizzella V, Romani GL, Rossini PM.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Apr 29; 19(8):2329-36. PubMed ID: 15090059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. N1m recovery from decline after exposure to noise with strong spectral contrasts.
    Okamoto H, Ross B, Kakigi R, Kubo T, Pantev C.
    Hear Res; 2004 Oct 29; 196(1-2):77-86. PubMed ID: 15464304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Intensity changes in a continuous tone: auditory cortical potentials comparison with frequency changes.
    Dimitrijevic A, Lolli B, Michalewski HJ, Pratt H, Zeng FG, Starr A.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb 29; 120(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 19112047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Neuromagnetic representation of musical register information in human auditory cortex.
    Andermann M, van Dinther R, Patterson RD, Rupp A.
    Neuroimage; 2011 Aug 15; 57(4):1499-506. PubMed ID: 21640834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Auditory processing indexed by stimulus-induced alpha desynchronization in children.
    Fujioka T, Ross B.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 May 15; 68(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 18331761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Interhemispheric support during demanding auditory signal-in-noise processing.
    Stracke H, Okamoto H, Pantev C.
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jun 15; 19(6):1440-7. PubMed ID: 18936273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. A multilevel and cross-modal approach towards neuronal mechanisms of auditory streaming.
    Rahne T, Deike S, Selezneva E, Brosch M, König R, Scheich H, Böckmann M, Brechmann A.
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul 18; 1220():118-31. PubMed ID: 17765207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Auditory evoked field at threshold.
    Lütkenhöner B, Klein JS.
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun 18; 228(1-2):188-200. PubMed ID: 17434696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Auditory processing in children with language-based learning problems: a magnetencephalography study.
    Diedler J, Pietz J, Brunner M, Hornberger C, Bast T, Rupp A.
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jun 17; 20(9):844-8. PubMed ID: 19434007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Tone frequency maps and receptive fields in the developing chinchilla auditory cortex.
    Pienkowski M, Harrison RV.
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan 17; 93(1):454-66. PubMed ID: 15342716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Effect of auditory motion velocity on reaction time and cortical processes.
    Getzmann S.
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct 17; 47(12):2625-33. PubMed ID: 19467249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Representation of auditory-filter phase characteristics in the cortex of human listeners.
    Rupp A, Sieroka N, Gutschalk A, Dau T.
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar 17; 99(3):1152-62. PubMed ID: 18184891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Stimulus context affects auditory cortical responses to changes in interaural correlation.
    Chait M, Poeppel D, Simon JZ.
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Jul 17; 98(1):224-31. PubMed ID: 17493921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to interaural time delay and interaural correlation.
    Soeta Y, Nakagawa S.
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct 17; 220(1-2):106-15. PubMed ID: 16934951
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Noise-induced increase in human auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Alain C, Quan J, McDonald K, Van Roon P.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul 17; 30(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 19558607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Side of the stimulated ear influences the hemispheric balance in coding tonal stimuli.
    Yu HY, Chen JT, Wu ZA, Yeh TC, Ho LT, Lin YY.
    Neurol Res; 2007 Jul 17; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17535555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.