These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments. Phillips FM, Tzermiadianos MN, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Carandang G, Renner SM, Rosler DM, Ochoa JA, Patwardhan AG. Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system. Wilke HJ, Schmidt H, Werner K, Schmölz W, Drumm J. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov 15; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model. Gerber M, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, Fifield MS, LeHuec JC, Dickman CA. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr 01; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, Hu N, McAfee PC. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment. Mihara H, Onari K, Cheng BC, David SM, Zdeblick TA. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb 01; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs. Hongo M, Gay RE, Zhao KD, Ilharreborde B, Huddleston PM, Berglund LJ, An KN, Zhao C. Spine J; 2009 Oct 01; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective. Cunningham BW, Hu N, Beatson HJ, Serhan H, Sefter JC, McAfee PC. Spine J; 2009 Sep 01; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics. Phillips FM, Tzermiadianos MN, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Carandang G, Dooris A, Patwardhan AG. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct 15; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion. Hartmann F, Dietz SO, Kuhn S, Hely H, Rommens PM, Gercek E. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011 Oct 15; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns. O'Leary P, Nicolakis M, Lorenz MA, Voronov LI, Zindrick MR, Ghanayem A, Havey RM, Carandang G, Sartori M, Gaitanis IN, Fronczak S, Patwardhan AG. Spine J; 2005 Oct 15; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics. Zhu Q, Larson CR, Sjovold SG, Rosler DM, Keynan O, Wilson DR, Cripton PA, Oxland TR. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan 01; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S, Minamide A, Su Kim K, Tomita K, Hutton WC. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul 15; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation. Tzermiadianos MN, Mekhail A, Voronov LI, Zook J, Havey RM, Renner SM, Carandang G, Abjornson C, Patwardhan AG. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan 15; 33(2):E38-43. PubMed ID: 18197089 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination. Grauer JN, Biyani A, Faizan A, Kiapour A, Sairyo K, Ivanov A, Ebraheim NA, Patel TCh, Goel VK. Spine J; 2006 Jan 15; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions. Hartmann F, Dietz SO, Hely H, Rommens PM, Gercek E. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Jul 15; 131(7):917-26. PubMed ID: 21190031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Erkan S, Rivera Y, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE. Spine J; 2009 Oct 15; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine. Gonzalez-Blohm SA, Doulgeris JJ, Aghayev K, Lee WE, Volkov A, Vrionis FD. J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb 15; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]