These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures. Janssen WA, van de Sande R, Noorthoorn EO, Nijman HL, Bowers L, Mulder CL, Smit A, Widdershoven GA, Steinert T. Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011 Nov; 34(6):429-38. PubMed ID: 22079087 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [A prospective analysis of coercive measures in an inpatient department of child and adolescent psychiatry]. Fetzer AE, Steinert T, Metzger W, Fegert JM. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2006 Nov; 55(10):754-66. PubMed ID: 17253025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Changes in the use of compulsory measures in Norwegian psychiatric institutions]. Høyer G, Drange H. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Feb 20; 114(5):585-8. PubMed ID: 8209344 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Coercive measures in psychiatry. Restraint on psychiatric units of the Hannover Medical University]. Bastiaan P, Debus S, Haltenhof H. Psychiatr Prax; 1998 Sep 20; 25(5):231-4. PubMed ID: 9816602 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The reasons for using restraint and seclusion in psychiatric inpatient care: A nationwide 15-year study. Keski-Valkama A, Sailas E, Eronen M, Koivisto AM, Lönnqvist J, Kaltiala-Heino R. Nord J Psychiatry; 2010 Apr 20; 64(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 19883195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Coercive measures in psychiatric clinics in Germany: current practice (2012)]. Steinert T, Schmid P, Arbeitskreis zur Prävention von Gewalt und Zwang,Landesverband der Psychiatrie-Erfahrenen Baden-Württemberg. Nervenarzt; 2014 May 20; 85(5):621-9. PubMed ID: 23979363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of coercive measures in psychiatry. Mayoral F, Torres F. Actas Esp Psiquiatr; 2005 May 20; 33(5):331-8. PubMed ID: 16155816 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Use of coercive measures in Norwegian psychiatric institutions]. Høyer G, Drange H. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1991 May 30; 111(14):1709-13. PubMed ID: 2063377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical course and prevalence of coercive measures: an observational study among involuntarily hospitalised psychiatric patients. Hotzy F, Moetteli S, Theodoridou A, Schneeberger AR, Seifritz E, Hoff P, Jäger M. Swiss Med Wkly; 2018 May 30; 148():w14616. PubMed ID: 29698543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Frequency of coercive measures as a quality indicator for psychiatric hospitals?]. Steinert T, Flammer E. Nervenarzt; 2019 Jan 30; 90(1):35-39. PubMed ID: 30215134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The use of mechanical restraint and seclusion: comparing the clinical practice in Germany and Switzerland]. Martin V, Bernhardsgrütter R, Göbel R, Steinert T. Psychiatr Prax; 2007 Apr 30; 34 Suppl 2():S212-7. PubMed ID: 17394113 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Developing a cooperation model between 3 psychiatric clinics with the goal of quality assurance in mandatory treatment exemplified by restraint documentation]. Ketelsen R, Zechert C, Klimitz H, Rauwald C. Psychiatr Prax; 2001 Mar 30; 28(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 11305161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]