These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

391 related items for PubMed ID: 17108634

  • 1. Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation research: is it an issue or not?
    Machan C, Ammenwerth E, Bodner T.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():957-62. PubMed ID: 17108634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
    Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses.
    Vaitkus PT, Brar C.
    Am Heart J; 2007 Feb; 153(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17239689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.
    Mahid SS, Qadan M, Hornung CA, Galandiuk S.
    Br J Surg; 2008 Aug; 95(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 18618864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. STARE-HI--Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics.
    Talmon J, Ammenwerth E, Brender J, de Keizer N, Nykänen P, Rigby M.
    Int J Med Inform; 2009 Jan; 78(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18930696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S, Kissling W, Davis JM.
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
    Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA.
    CMAJ; 2007 Apr 10; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L, Datta S, Smith HS, Hirsch JA.
    Pain Physician; 2009 Apr 10; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Review articles and publication bias.
    Kleijnen J, Knipschild P.
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1992 May 10; 42(5):587-91. PubMed ID: 1388359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Publication bias in papers presented to the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting.
    Harris IA, Mourad MS, Kadir A, Solomon MJ, Young JM.
    ANZ J Surg; 2006 Jun 10; 76(6):427-31. PubMed ID: 16768761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Meta-analysis in evidence-based orthodontics.
    Papadopoulos MA.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2003 May 10; 6(2):112-26. PubMed ID: 12809274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK.
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep 10; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR, Schwarzer G, Rücker G, Künstler R.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun 10; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study.
    Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Pham B, Brehaut J, Moher D.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr 10; 62(4):380-386.e1. PubMed ID: 19128940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Rücker G, Schwarzer G, Carpenter J.
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb 28; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power.
    Borm GF, den Heijer M, Zielhuis GA.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan 28; 62(1):47.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18620841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials.
    Liebeskind DS, Kidwell CS, Sayre JW, Saver JL.
    Neurology; 2006 Sep 26; 67(6):973-9. PubMed ID: 17000963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.