These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
277 related items for PubMed ID: 17113670
1. Dose distribution in 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: comparison of two treatment techniques (six coplanar fields and two dynamic arcs). Jereczek-Fossa BA, Cattani F, D'Onofrio A, Cambria R, Kowalczyk A, Corallo A, Vavassori A, Zerini D, Ivaldi GB, DeCobelli O, Orecchia R. Radiother Oncol; 2006 Dec; 81(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 17113670 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The comparison of radiotherapy techniques for treatment of the prostate cancer: the three-field vs. the four-field. Milecki P, Piotrowski T, Dymnicka M. Neoplasma; 2004 Dec; 51(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 15004663 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative treatment planning on localized prostate carcinoma conformal photon- versus proton-based radiotherapy. Mock U, Bogner J, Georg D, Auberger T, Pötter R. Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Jul; 181(7):448-55. PubMed ID: 15995838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Simplified intensity-modulated arc therapy for dose escalated prostate cancer radiotherapy. Bauman G, Gete E, Chen JZ, Wong E. Med Dosim; 2004 Jul; 29(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 15023389 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A phase II trial for the optimisation of treatment position in the radiation therapy of prostate cancer. O'Neill L, Armstrong J, Buckney S, Assiri M, Cannon M, Holmberg O. Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18453021 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing 3-, 4- and 6-fields techniques for conformal irradiation of prostate and seminal vesicles using dose-volume histograms. Fiorino C, Reni M, Cattaneo GM, Bolognesi A, Calandrino R. Radiother Oncol; 1997 Sep; 44(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 9380824 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective three-dimensional analysis about the impact of differences in the clinical target volume in prostate cancer irradiation on normal-tissue exposure. A potential for increasing the benefit/risk ratio. Hille A, Töws N, Schmidberger H, Hess CF. Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Dec; 181(12):789-95. PubMed ID: 16362789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with multileaf collimators (MLCs) optimization of the undulating dose distribution at the MLC edge. Koelbl O, Schwab F, Bratengeier K, Vordermark D, Flentje M. Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Feb; 181(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 15702299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the conventional 'box technique' with two different 'conformal' beam arrangements for prostate cancer treatment. Magrini SM, Cellai E, Rossi F, Pertici M, Compagnucci A, Biti GP. Cancer Radiother; 1999 Feb; 3(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 10394339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Phase II dose escalation study of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: use of dose-volume constraints to achieve rectal isotoxicity. Vargas C, Yan D, Kestin LL, Krauss D, Lockman DM, Brabbins DS, Martinez AA. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Sep 01; 63(1):141-9. PubMed ID: 16111582 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of benchmark dose-volume histograms for selection of the optimal technique between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in prostate cancer. Luo C, Yang CC, Narayan S, Stern RL, Perks J, Goldberg Z, Ryu J, Purdy JA, Vijayakumar S. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov 15; 66(4):1253-62. PubMed ID: 17145540 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of treatment planning by carbon ion radiotherapy and by intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostatic adenocarcinoma]. Wang WH, Tsuji H, Ishikawa H, Tsujii H, Kamada T, Mizoe J, Li YX. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Nov 15; 28(11):836-9. PubMed ID: 17416005 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Australia-wide comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy prostate plans. Skala M, Holloway L, Bailey M, Kneebone A. Australas Radiol; 2005 Jun 15; 49(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 15932465 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjoint Monte Carlo method for prostate external photon beam treatment planning: an application to 3D patient anatomy. Wang B, Goldstein M, Xu XG, Sahoo N. Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar 07; 50(5):923-35. PubMed ID: 15798265 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rectal dose reduction using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: A combination of conformal dynamic-arc and five-static field technique. Sasaoka M, Nishikawa A, Futami T, Nishida K, Miwa H, Kadoya K. Radiother Oncol; 2009 Mar 07; 90(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 19008004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of non-exclusion of the rectum from the boost PTV in IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients. Kassim I, Dirkx ML, Heijmen BJ. Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul 07; 92(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 19278745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the optimal co-planar field arrangement for use in the boost phase of dose escalated conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Khoo VS, Bedford JL, Webb S, Dearnaley DP. Br J Radiol; 2001 Feb 07; 74(878):177-82. PubMed ID: 11718391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. RapidArc volumetric modulated therapy planning for prostate cancer patients. Kjaer-Kristoffersen F, Ohlhues L, Medin J, Korreman S. Acta Oncol; 2009 Feb 07; 48(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 18855157 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]