These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1193 related items for PubMed ID: 17122122

  • 1. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A, Crabb DP, Spratt A, Garway-Heath DF.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A, Loge K, Schroeder B, Füllhas MO, Wiegand W.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy.
    del Buey MA, Cristóbal JA, Ascaso FJ, Lavilla L, Lanchares E.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 50(7):3199-202. PubMed ID: 19255149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure.
    Broman AT, Congdon NG, Bandeen-Roche K, Quigley HA.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jul; 16(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 18091174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients.
    Wells AP, Garway-Heath DF, Poostchi A, Wong T, Chan KC, Sachdev N.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Aug; 49(8):3262-8. PubMed ID: 18316697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery.
    Hager A, Loge K, Füllhas MO, Schroeder B, Grossherr M, Wiegand W.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Sep; 144(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 17631265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty.
    Chou CY, Jordan CA, McGhee CN, Patel DV.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 153(3):412-8. PubMed ID: 22000702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M, Halverson KD, Qualls C.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of the ocular response analyzer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
    Feizi S, Hashemloo A, Rastegarpour A.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul 29; 52(8):5887-91. PubMed ID: 21447674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Relative importance of factors affecting corneal hysteresis measurement.
    Sullivan-Mee M, Katiyar S, Pensyl D, Halverson KD, Qualls C.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 May 29; 89(5):E803-11. PubMed ID: 22426173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G.
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb 29; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 60.