These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc. Sakata LM, Deleon-Ortega J, Arthur SN, Monheit BE, Girkin CA. Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma. Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J. Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma. Liu S, Lam S, Weinreb RN, Ye C, Cheung CY, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep 21; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul 21; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice? Szatmáry G, Biousse V, Newman NJ. Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep 21; 120(9):1162-73. PubMed ID: 12215089 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 30-2 Standard and Fast programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for perimetry in patients with intracranial tumors. Singh MD, Jain K. Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov 21; 65(11):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 29133651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Glaucoma detection with matrix and standard achromatic perimetry. Burgansky-Eliash Z, Wollstein G, Patel A, Bilonick RA, Ishikawa H, Kagemann L, Dilworth WD, Schuman JS. Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul 21; 91(7):933-8. PubMed ID: 17215267 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study. Liu S, Yu M, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK. JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan 21; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul 21; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing. Wall M, Punke SG, Stickney TL, Brito CF, Withrow KR, Kardon RH. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Feb 21; 42(2):528-37. PubMed ID: 11157893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm for central visual field defects unrelated to nerve fiber layer. Hirasawa K, Shoji N. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 May 21; 254(5):845-54. PubMed ID: 26279004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of visual field end point criteria for standard automated perimetry, full-threshold, and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm strategies: diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. Bourne RR, Jahanbakhsh K, Boden C, Zangwill LM, Hoffmann EM, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, Sample PA. Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec 21; 144(6):908-913. PubMed ID: 17919445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR. Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun 21; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. Budenz DL, Rhee P, Feuer WJ, McSoley J, Johnson CA, Anderson DR. Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep 21; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage. Soliman MA, de Jong LA, Ismaeil AA, van den Berg TJ, de Smet MD. Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar 21; 109(3):444-54. PubMed ID: 11874745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields. Reznicek L, Lamparter J, Vogel M, Kampik A, Hirneiß C. Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul 21; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma. Boden C, Pascual J, Medeiros FA, Aihara M, Weinreb RN, Sample PA. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul 21; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma. Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S. Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May 21; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Converting to SITA-standard from full-threshold visual field testing in the follow-up phase of a clinical trial. Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Motyka BM, Niziol LM, Mills RP, Lichter PR. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Aug 21; 46(8):2755-9. PubMed ID: 16043847 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]