These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
176 related items for PubMed ID: 1714070
21. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix. Buntinx F, Boon ME, Beck S, Knottnerus JA, Essed GG. Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical material 1989-1990]. Cisláková L, Várady L, Prekop R, Holler J. Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1992 Sep; 41(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 1394476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates. Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Rietveld-Scheffers PE. Acta Cytol; 1986 Sep; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The cytobrush for evaluating routine cervicovaginal-endocervical smears. Lai-Goldman M, Nieberg RK, Mulcahy D, Wiesmeier E. J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):959-63. PubMed ID: 2246763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Risk factors for Clamydia infections of the genital organs in adolescent females]. Sedlecki K, Markovic M, Rajic G. Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001 Oct; 129(7-8):169-74. PubMed ID: 11797445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Investigation of Chlamydia trachomatis positivity in women with and without gynecologic complaints by cytologic and direct immunofluorescence methods]. Ozdağ D, Us D, Demirezen S, Beksaç S. Mikrobiyol Bul; 2007 Jan; 41(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 17427552 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy. Stillson T, Knight AL, Elswick RK. J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women. Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW. Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Immunofluorescence detection in Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical smears using monoclonal antibodies]. Kassabova M, Bertschewa M, Popow A. Zentralbl Gynakol; 1991 Oct; 113(13):767-71. PubMed ID: 1927127 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Sensitivity and specificity of the Papanicolaou-stained cervical smear in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Geerling S, Nettum JA, Lindner LE, Miller SL, Dutton L, Wechter S. Acta Cytol; 1985 Oct; 29(5):671-5. PubMed ID: 2413669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells. Cannon JM, Blythe JG. Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush. Chalvardjian A, De Marchi WG, Bell V, Nishikawa R. CMAJ; 1991 Feb 01; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection by direct immunofluorescence staining of genital secretion. Wiesmeier E, Bruckner D, Black M. Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Mar 01; 69(3 Pt 1):347-9. PubMed ID: 3547210 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling. Rammou-Kinia R, Anagnostopoulou I, Gomousa M. Acta Cytol; 1991 Mar 01; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Chlamydial infection in Papanicolaou-stained cervical smears. de Borges RJ, Carmona O, Machado H, Esparza J. Acta Cytol; 1984 Mar 01; 28(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 6589928 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]