These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

176 related items for PubMed ID: 1714070

  • 41. Efficacy of the cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells.
    Kristensen GB, Hølund B, Grinsted P.
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):849-51. PubMed ID: 2588918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Evaluation of proposed cytomorphologic criteria for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in Papanicolaou smears.
    Bernal JN, Martinez MA, Dabancens A.
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 2728785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Investigation into the value of Papanicolaou stained cervical smears for the diagnosis of chlamydial cervical infection.
    Forster GE, Cookey I, Munday PE, Richman PI, Jha R, Coleman D, Thomas BJ, Hawkins DA, Evans RT, Taylor-Robinson D.
    J Clin Pathol; 1985 Apr; 38(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 2580863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
    Ferenczy A, Robitaille J, Guralnick M, Shatz R.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Should the Cytobrush be used in routine screening for cervical pathology?
    van Erp EJ, Dersjant-Roorda MC, Arentz NP, Stijnen T, Trimbos JB.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Oct; 30(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 2572484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. [Comparative evaluation of various direct and culture methods for the diagnosis of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections].
    Martelli P, Crovatto M, Gava G, Chiaradia V, Santini G.
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1986 Mar; 22(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 3538126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. What sampling device is the most appropriate for vaginal vault cytology in gynaecological cancer follow up?
    Del Pup L, Canzonieri V, Serraino D, Campagnutta E.
    Radiol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 46(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 23077454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Spatula/cytobrush vs. spatula/cotton swab detection of cervical condylomatous lesions.
    Selvaggi SM.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):629-33. PubMed ID: 2810246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. A comparison of nonculture-dependent methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women.
    Baselski VS, McNeeley SG, Ryan G, Robison M.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3299179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. A correlative study of Papanicolaou smear, fluorescent antibody, and culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Spence MR, Barbacci M, Kappus E, Quinn T.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):691-5. PubMed ID: 3531937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Demonstration of Chlamydia trachomatis in Papanicolaou-stained gynecological smears.
    Rantala I, Kivinen S.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Jan; 17(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 9512183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis: the value of cytobrush specimens for detection by PCR compared with cell culture.
    Wandall DA, Ostergaard L, Overgaard L, Worm AM, Gutschik E.
    APMIS; 1998 May; 106(5):580-4. PubMed ID: 9674896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Use of the Cytobrush for concurrent cytology and chlamydia sampling: a comparison of immunofluorescence and culture for detection of chlamydia.
    Szarewski A, Pompey A, Cronin D, Bertrand J, Bradbeer C, Thin RN.
    Int J STD AIDS; 1991 May; 2(5):367-8. PubMed ID: 1958724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. [Chlamydia trachomatis--studies on the reliability of its detection in Papanicolaou preparations].
    Donath EM, Schrage R, Hoyme UB.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1985 Jun; 45(6):402-5. PubMed ID: 4018517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Sampling accuracy of the modified Ayre spatula/Zelsmyr Cytobrush versus the modified Ayre spatula/bulb aspirator in the collection of cells from the uterine cervix.
    Selvaggi SM, Malviya V.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1991 Jun; 7(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 1879271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Satisfactory sampling in cytological cervical diagnosis: comparison between a conventional and a new sampling device.
    Lukic A, Iannaccio S, Heyn R, Villani S, Nobili F, Giarnieri E, Mancini R, Moscarini M, Giovagnoli MR.
    Anticancer Res; 2013 Mar; 33(3):917-22. PubMed ID: 23482762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Cytologic manifestations of cervical and vaginal infections. II. Confirmation of Chlamydia trachomatis infection by direct immunofluorescence using monoclonal antibodies.
    Kiviat NB, Peterson M, Kinney-Thomas E, Tam M, Stamm WE, Holmes KK.
    JAMA; 1985 Feb 15; 253(7):997-1000. PubMed ID: 2578582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.