These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

177 related items for PubMed ID: 17142260

  • 21. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
    Sloss EA, Southard KA, Qian F, Stock SE, Mann KR, Meyer DL, Southard TE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB, Halazonetis DJ, Sifakakis IB.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances.
    Freitas MR, Lima DV, Freitas KM, Janson G, Henriques JF.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 18725383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B, Schwestka-Polly R, Nägerl H, Ihlow D, Kubein-Meesenburg D.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A randomized controlled study of early headgear treatment on occlusal stability--a 13 year follow-up.
    Krusinskiene V, Kiuttu P, Julku J, Silvola AS, Kantomaa T, Pirttiniemi P.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 18632838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance.
    Mills CM, McCulloch KJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR, Dolce C, McGorray SP, Le H, King GJ, Wheeler TT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric long-term study.
    Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jun; 103(6):510-20. PubMed ID: 8506812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Sagittal and vertical changes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion according to the Cetlin method.
    Ferro F, Monsurró A, Perillo L.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 10935955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The effects of cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in the permanent dentition.
    Varlik SK, Iscan HN.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 18678761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Soft tissue facial profile changes following functional appliance therapy.
    Quintão C, Helena I, Brunharo VP, Menezes RC, Almeida MA.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 16113035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Janisse FN, Bayirli B.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):7.e9-19. PubMed ID: 17208098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY, Sampson WJ, Townsend GC, Hughes T.
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Effects of activator and activator + anterior high-pull headgear on the growth direction of Class 2 cases].
    Uner O, Akkaya S, Buyruk F.
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 2489150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Orthodontic intervention in the early mixed dentition: a prospective, controlled study on the effects of the eruption guidance appliance.
    Keski-Nisula K, Hernesniemi R, Heiskanen M, Keski-Nisula L, Varrela J.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):254-60; quiz 328.e2. PubMed ID: 18249292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. A comparison of splinted and banded Herbst appliances: treatment changes and complications.
    Hägg U, Tse EL, Rabie AB, Robinson W.
    Aust Orthod J; 2002 Nov; 18(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 12462684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
    Purkayastha SK, Rabie AB, Wong R.
    World J Orthod; 2008 Nov; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Skeletal and dental outcomes of a new magnetic functional appliance, the Sydney Magnoglide, in Class II correction.
    Phelan A, Tarraf NE, Taylor P, Hönscheid R, Drescher D, Baccetti T, Darendeliler MA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):759-72. PubMed ID: 22640678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.
    Kaya B, Arman A, Uçkan S, Yazici AC.
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 19509344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Long-term soft-tissue response to orthodontic treatment with early cervical headgear--a randomized study.
    Virkkula T, Kantomaa T, Julku J, Pirttiniemi P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):586-96. PubMed ID: 19409341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.