These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

159 related items for PubMed ID: 17151762

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Re-examining the effect of particle phase functions on the remote-sensing reflectance.
    Xiong Y, Zhang X, He S, Gray DJ.
    Appl Opt; 2017 Aug 20; 56(24):6881-6888. PubMed ID: 29048028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Modeling the remote-sensing reflectance of highly turbid waters.
    Wong J, Liew SC, Wong E, Lee Z.
    Appl Opt; 2019 Apr 01; 58(10):2671-2677. PubMed ID: 31045069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Neural network approach for correction of multiple scattering errors in the LISST-VSF instrument.
    Ugulen HS, Koestner D, Sandven H, Hamre B, Kristoffersen AS, Saetre C.
    Opt Express; 2023 Sep 25; 31(20):32737-32751. PubMed ID: 37859069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Understanding the contribution of phytoplankton phase functions to uncertainties in the water colour signal.
    Lain LR, Bernard S, Matthews MW.
    Opt Express; 2017 Feb 20; 25(4):A151-A165. PubMed ID: 28241532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Scattering error corrections for in situ absorption and attenuation measurements.
    McKee D, Piskozub J, Brown I.
    Opt Express; 2008 Nov 24; 16(24):19480-92. PubMed ID: 19030034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Efficient Monte Carlo simulation reveals significant multiple scattering errors in underwater angular scattering measurements.
    Ugulen HS, Sandven H, Hamre B, Kristoffersen AS, Sætre C.
    Opt Express; 2022 Mar 28; 30(7):10802-10817. PubMed ID: 35473039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Sensitivity analysis of volume scattering phase functions.
    Tuchow N, Broughton J, Kudela R.
    Opt Express; 2016 Aug 08; 24(16):18559-70. PubMed ID: 27505819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Angular reflectance of a highly forward scattering medium at grazing incidence of light.
    Marinyuk VV, Remizovich VS, Sheberstov SV.
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2020 Mar 01; 37(3):501-510. PubMed ID: 32118935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of optically derived particle size distributions: scattering over the full angular range versus diffraction at near forward angles.
    Zhang X, Gray DJ, Huot Y, You Y, Bi L.
    Appl Opt; 2012 Jul 20; 51(21):5085-99. PubMed ID: 22858949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Laboratory experiments for inter-comparison of three volume scattering meters to measure angular scattering properties of hydrosols.
    Harmel T, Hieronymi M, Slade W, Röttgers R, Roullier F, Chami M.
    Opt Express; 2016 Jan 25; 24(2):A234-56. PubMed ID: 26832578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Improved method of Fournier-Forand marine phase function parameterization.
    Freda W, Piskozub J.
    Opt Express; 2007 Oct 01; 15(20):12763-8. PubMed ID: 19550545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.