These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 17160638

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ, Shannon RV.
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10890731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Conditioning pulse trains in cochlear implants: effects on loudness growth.
    Hong RS, Rubinstein JT.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Jan; 27(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 16371847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ, Skinner MW, Martin LF, Holden LK, Galvin KL, Holden TA, Whitford L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.
    Bierer JA, Nye AD.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Apr; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Preferential and non-preferential transmission of formant information by an analogue cochlear implant using noise: the role of the nerve threshold.
    Morse RP, Evans EF.
    Hear Res; 1999 Jul; 133(1-2):120-32. PubMed ID: 10416870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
    Green T, Faulkner A, Rosen S.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Jul; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Loudness scaling in cochlear implant patients within the scope of preoperative evaluation].
    Müller J, Schön F.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Mar; 73(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 8172631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM, Chen XQ, Zhao XT, Kong Y, Li YX, Liu S, Liu B, Mo LY.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Vocoder simulations of highly focused cochlear stimulation with limited dynamic range and discriminable steps.
    Stafford RC, Stafford JW, Wells JD, Loizou PC, Keller MD.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Jul; 35(2):262-70. PubMed ID: 24322978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR, Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Lake J.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.