These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

377 related items for PubMed ID: 17170328

  • 1. Interdisciplinary approach to endodontic therapy for uncooperative children in a dental school environment.
    Soares F, Britto LR, Vertucci FJ, Guelmann M.
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Dec; 70(12):1362-5. PubMed ID: 17170328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine to midazolam regimens for oral sedation of pediatric dental patients.
    Chowdhury J, Vargas KG.
    Pediatr Dent; 2005 Dec; 27(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16173222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A retrospective study of chloral hydrate, meperidine, hydroxyzine, and midazolam regimens used to sedate children for dental care.
    Wilson S, Easton J, Lamb K, Orchardson R, Casamassimo P.
    Pediatr Dent; 2000 Dec; 22(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10769854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients using chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine, and nitrous oxide--a retrospective study of 382 sedations.
    Needleman HL, Joshi A, Griffith DG.
    Pediatr Dent; 1995 Dec; 17(7):424-31. PubMed ID: 8786908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Children sedated for dental care: a pilot study of the 24-hour postsedation period.
    Martinez D, Wilson S.
    Pediatr Dent; 2006 Dec; 28(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 16805359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A randomized double-blind trial of chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine versus midazolam/acetaminophen in the sedation of pediatric dental outpatients.
    Reeves ST, Wiedenfeld KR, Wrobleski J, Hardin CL, Pinosky ML.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996 Dec; 63(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 8708127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of a chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine combination with and without meperidine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients.
    Poorman TL, Farrington FH, Mourino AP.
    Pediatr Dent; 1990 Dec; 12(5):288-91. PubMed ID: 2095539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of oral midazolam with a combination of oral midazolam and nitrous oxide-oxygen inhalation in the effectiveness of dental sedation for young children.
    Al-Zahrani AM, Wyne AH, Sheta SA.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009 Dec; 27(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 19414968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients: an investigation of chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine pamoate, and meperidine vs. chloral hydrate and hydroxyzine pamoate.
    Hasty MF, Vann WF, Dilley DC, Anderson JA.
    Pediatr Dent; 1991 Dec; 13(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 1945978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effectiveness of midazolam and hydroxyzine as sedative agents for young pediatric dental patients.
    Shapira J, Holan G, Botzer E, Kupietzky A, Tal E, Fuks AB.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996 Dec; 63(6):421-5. PubMed ID: 9017176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Project USAP 2000--use of sedative agents by pediatric dentists: a 15-year follow-up survey.
    Houpt M.
    Pediatr Dent; 2002 Dec; 24(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 12212869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of oral chloral hydrate with intramuscular ketamine, meperidine, and promethazine for pediatric sedation--preliminary report.
    Campbell RL, Ross GA, Campbell JR, Mourino AP.
    Anesth Prog; 1998 Dec; 45(2):46-50. PubMed ID: 10356431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of submucosal midazolam on behavior and physiologic response when combined with oral chloral hydrate and nitrous oxide sedation.
    Myers GR, Maestrello CL, Mourino AP, Best AM.
    Pediatr Dent; 2004 Dec; 26(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 15080356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Association between bispectral analysis and level of conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients.
    Religa ZC, Wilson S, Ganzberg SI, Casamassimo PS.
    Pediatr Dent; 2002 Dec; 24(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 12064495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparing the safety, efficacy and recovery of intranasal midazolam vs. oral chloral hydrate and promethazine.
    Dallman JA, Ignelzi MA, Briskie DM.
    Pediatr Dent; 2001 Dec; 23(5):424-30. PubMed ID: 11699169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intravenous sedation in pediatric dentistry using midazolam, nalbuphine and droperidol.
    Milnes AR, Maupomé G, Cannon J.
    Pediatr Dent; 2000 Dec; 22(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 10769855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of three conscious sedation regimens for pediatric dental patients.
    Torres-Pérez J, Tapia-García I, Rosales-Berber MA, Hernández-Sierra JF, Pozos-Guillén Ade J.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2007 Dec; 31(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 17550044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Factors associated with administration route when using midazolam for pediatric conscious sedation.
    Primosch RE, Bender F.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001 Dec; 68(4):233-8, 228. PubMed ID: 11862873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A prospective study of 2 sedation regimens in children: chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine versus midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine.
    Sheroan MM, Dilley DC, Lucas WJ, Vann WF.
    Anesth Prog; 2006 Dec; 53(3):83-90. PubMed ID: 17175821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Survey of sedation techniques used Among pediatric dentists in New York State.
    Allen SC, Bernat JE, Perinpanayagam MK.
    N Y State Dent J; 2006 Dec; 72(5):53-5. PubMed ID: 17036590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.