These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

236 related items for PubMed ID: 17175099

  • 1. Quantitative estimation of uncertainty in human risk analysis.
    Sassi G, Vernai AM, Ruggeri B.
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jun 25; 145(1-2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17175099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Uncertainty evaluation of human risk analysis (HRA) of chemicals by multiple exposure routes.
    Sassi G, Ruggeri B.
    Risk Anal; 2008 Oct 25; 28(5):1343-56. PubMed ID: 18684163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Chemicals exposure: scoring procedure and uncertainty propagation in scenario selection for risk analysis.
    Ruggeri B.
    Chemosphere; 2009 Oct 25; 77(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 19666186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of ISO-GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty: application to direct cadmium measurement in water by GFAAS.
    Theodorou D, Meligotsidou L, Karavoltsos S, Burnetas A, Dassenakis M, Scoullos M.
    Talanta; 2011 Feb 15; 83(5):1568-74. PubMed ID: 21238753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Model comparison for risk assessment: a case study of contaminated groundwater.
    Chen YC, Ma HW.
    Chemosphere; 2006 May 15; 63(5):751-61. PubMed ID: 16213568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Integration of probabilistic exposure assessment and probabilistic hazard characterization.
    van der Voet H, Slob W.
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr 15; 27(2):351-71. PubMed ID: 17511703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A probabilistic effect assessment model for hazardous substances at the workplace.
    Schneider K, Schuhmacher-Wolz U, Hassauer M, Darschnik S, Elmshäuser E, Mosbach-Schulz O.
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar 15; 44(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 16356615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Uncertainty distribution associated with estimating a proportion in microbial risk assessment.
    Miconnet N, Cornu M, Beaufort A, Rosso L, Denis JB.
    Risk Anal; 2005 Feb 15; 25(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15787755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Towards quantitative uncertainty assessment for cancer risks: central estimates and probability distributions of risk in dose-response modeling.
    Kopylev L, Chen C, White P.
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec 15; 49(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 17905499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Estimating acute dietary intakes of chemicals.
    Tennant DR.
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct 15; 30(2 Pt 2):S99-102. PubMed ID: 10597621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Combining the cost of reducing uncertainty with the selection of risk assessment models for remediation decision of site contamination.
    Chen YC, Ma HW.
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Mar 06; 141(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 16926066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A spatial risk assessment methodology to support the remediation of contaminated land.
    Carlon C, Pizzol L, Critto A, Marcomini A.
    Environ Int; 2008 Apr 06; 34(3):397-411. PubMed ID: 18031816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.