These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

208 related items for PubMed ID: 17182877

  • 1. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ, Galvin JJ.
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS, Kreft HA.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Hearing results with deep insertion of cochlear implant electrodes.
    Hodges AV, Villasuso E, Balkany T, Bird PA, Butts S, Lee D, Gomez O.
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jan; 20(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 9918173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Is psychological status a determinant of speech perception outcomes in highly selected good adolescent cochlear implant users?
    Yucel E, Sennaroglu G.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1415-22. PubMed ID: 17586056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM, Julyan PJ, Hastings DL, Ramsden RT.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wolfe J, Baker S, Caraway T, Kasulis H, Mears A, Smith J, Swim L, Wood M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of talker variability on vowel recognition in cochlear implants.
    Chang YP, Fu QJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1331-41. PubMed ID: 17197499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [The contribution of different cochlear insertion region to Mandarin speech perception in users of cochlear implant].
    Qi B, Liu B, Liu S, Liu H, Dong R, Zhang N, Gong S.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 25(10):441-4. PubMed ID: 21809554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
    De Ruiter AM, Debruyne JA, Chenault MN, Francart T, Brokx JP.
    Ear Hear; 2015 May; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.