These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


513 related items for PubMed ID: 17184805

  • 1. Stereo channels with different temporal frequency tunings.
    Lee S, Shioiri S, Yaguchi H.
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb; 47(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 17184805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Temporal aspects of spatial interactions affecting stereo-matching solutions.
    Zhang ZL, Cantor C, Ghose T, Schor CM.
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(27):3183-92. PubMed ID: 15482804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Vertical-size disparities are temporally integrated for slant perception.
    Fukuda K, Kaneko H, Matsumiya K.
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2749-56. PubMed ID: 16600323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis.
    Chen CC, Tyler CW.
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2691-702. PubMed ID: 16580041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Perception of depth and motion from ambiguous binocular information.
    Sakai K, Ogiya M, Hirai Y.
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(19):2471-80. PubMed ID: 15961137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E, Erkelens CJ.
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity.
    Cisarik PM, Harwerth RS.
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 May 07; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax.
    Bradshaw MF, Hibbard PB, Parton AD, Rose D, Langley K.
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep 07; 46(17):2636-44. PubMed ID: 16571356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dichoptic motion perception limited to depth of fixation?
    Lages M, Dolia A, Graf EW.
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan 07; 47(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 17112562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Contrast sensitivity of form and motion discrimination during binocular rivalry.
    Li DF, Freeman AW, Alais D.
    Vision Res; 2005 May 07; 45(10):1255-63. PubMed ID: 15733958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.
    Brooks KR, Gillam BJ.
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar 07; 46(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 16054190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A new look at binocular stereopsis.
    Pizlo Z, Li Y, Francis G.
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug 07; 45(17):2244-55. PubMed ID: 15924939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Disparity-energy signals in perceived stereoscopic depth.
    Tanabe S, Yasuoka S, Fujita I.
    J Vis; 2008 Mar 26; 8(3):22.1-10. PubMed ID: 18484828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Temporal frequency and contrast tagging bias the type of competition in interocular switch rivalry.
    Silver MA, Logothetis NK.
    Vision Res; 2007 Feb 26; 47(4):532-43. PubMed ID: 17182075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.