These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
142 related items for PubMed ID: 17186503
1. The Bethesda Interobserver Reproducibility Study (BIRST): a web-based assessment of the Bethesda 2001 System for classifying cervical cytology. Sherman ME, Dasgupta A, Schiffman M, Nayar R, Solomon D. Cancer; 2007 Feb 25; 111(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 17186503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bethesda Interobserver Reproducibility Study-2 (BIRST-2): Bethesda System 2014. Kurtycz DFI, Staats PN, Chute DJ, Russell D, Pavelec D, Monaco SE, Friedlander MA, Wilbur DC, Nayar R. J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2017 Feb 25; 6(4):131-144. PubMed ID: 31043266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Bethesda System. A proposal for reporting abnormal cervical smears based on the reproducibility of cytopathologic diagnoses. Sherman ME, Schiffman MH, Erozan YS, Wacholder S, Kurman RJ. Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Nov 25; 116(11):1155-8. PubMed ID: 1444745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment. Slater DN, Rice S, Stewart R, Melling SE, Hewer EM, Smith JH. Cytopathology; 2005 Aug 25; 16(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 16048503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL cytology: use of qualitative assessment of p16INK4a positive cells to identify patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Wentzensen N, Bergeron C, Cas F, Vinokurova S, von Knebel Doeberitz M. Cancer; 2007 Feb 25; 111(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 17186505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Reproducibility of cytologic diagnosis: study of CRISAP Ile-de-France]. Barrès D, Bergeron C. Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Feb 25; 28(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 10758586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver variability in cytologic subclassification of squamous intraepithelial lesions--the Bethesda System vs. World Health Organization classification. Pajtler M, Audy-Jurković S, Milicić-Juhas V, Staklenac B, Pauzar B. Coll Antropol; 2006 Mar 25; 30(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 16617588 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin. Simsir A, Hwang S, Cangiarella J, Elgert P, Levine P, Sheffield MV, Roberson J, Talley L, Chhieng DC. Cancer; 2003 Dec 25; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of p63 for distinction of glandular versus squamous lesions in cervicovaginal specimens. Garcia MT, Acar BC, Jorda M, Gomez-Fernandez C, Ganjei-Azar P. Cancer; 2007 Feb 25; 111(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 17173320 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS): Interobserver reproducibility in cervical smears and corresponding thin-layer preparations. Lee KR, Darragh TM, Joste NE, Krane JF, Sherman ME, Hurley LB, Allred EM, Manos MM. Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Jan 25; 117(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 11789738 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the more restrictive definition of atypical squamous cells introduced by the 2001 Bethesda System on the sensitivity and specificity of the Papanicolaou test: a 5-year follow-up study of Papanicolaou tests originally interpreted as ASCUS, reclassified according to Bethesda 2001 criteria. Thrall MJ, Pambuccian SE, Stelow EB, McKeon DM, Miller L, Savik K, Gulbahce HE. Cancer; 2008 Jun 25; 114(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 18454461 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Subdividing atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance according to the Australian modified Bethesda, system: analysis of outcomes. Roberts JM, Thurloe JK, Bowditch RC, Laverty CR. Cancer; 2000 Apr 25; 90(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 10794157 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Problems encountered with the Bethesda System: the University of Iowa experience. Bottles K, Reiter RC, Steiner AL, Zaleski S, Bedrossian CW, Johnson SR. Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep 25; 78(3 Pt 1):410-4. PubMed ID: 1876375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of components of colposcopic grading. Massad LS, Jeronimo J, Schiffman M, National Institutes of Health/American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (NIH/ASCCP) Research Group. Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun 25; 111(6):1279-84. PubMed ID: 18515509 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of anal intraepithelial neoplasia. Lytwyn A, Salit IE, Raboud J, Chapman W, Darragh T, Winkler B, Tinmouth J, Mahony JB, Sano M. Cancer; 2005 Apr 01; 103(7):1447-56. PubMed ID: 15726546 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for clinical management of abnormal cervical cytology, part 1. Jordan J, Arbyn M, Martin-Hirsch P, Schenck U, Baldauf JJ, Da Silva D, Anttila A, Nieminen P, Prendiville W. Cytopathology; 2008 Dec 01; 19(6):342-54. PubMed ID: 19040546 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: lessons learned from human Papillomavirus DNA testing. Johnston EI, Logani S. Cancer; 2007 Jun 25; 111(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 17506090 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]