These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

634 related items for PubMed ID: 17191184

  • 1. Evaluation of early corneal endothelial cell loss in bimanual microincision cataract surgery (MICS) in comparison with standard phacoemulsification.
    Wilczynski M, Drobniewski I, Synder A, Omulecki W.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2006; 16(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 17191184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M, Supady E, Loba P, Synder A, Palenga-Pydyn D, Omulecki W.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1570-4. PubMed ID: 19683154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Kahraman G, Amon M, Franz C, Prinz A, Abela-Formanek C.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M, Supady E, Piotr L, Synder A, Palenga-Pydyn D, Omulecki W.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19683153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bimanual microincision versus standard coaxial small-incision cataract surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Chen C, Zhu M, Sun Y, Qu X, Xu X.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 25(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 25363858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparative analysis of early distance visual acuity in patients after coaxial phacoemulsification through the micro-incision (1.8 mm) and after standard phacoemulsification through the small incision (2.75 mm).
    Orczykowska M, Owidzkaz M, Synder A, Wilczyński M, Omulecki W.
    Klin Oczna; 2014 Sep; 116(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 25137913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery. One-year follow-up.
    Crema AS, Walsh A, Yamane Y, Nosé W.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1014-8. PubMed ID: 17531696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effect of the selected factors on corneal endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification.
    Orski M, Synder A, Pałenga-Pydyn D, Omulecki W, Wilczyński M.
    Klin Oczna; 2014 Jun; 116(2):94-9. PubMed ID: 25345285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.
    Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Thieme H, Dick HB.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 20117707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical results and higher-order aberrations after 1.4-mm biaxial cataract surgery and implantation of a new aspheric intraocular lens.
    von Sonnleithner C, Bergholz R, Gonnermann J, Klamann MK, Torun N, Bertelmann E.
    Ophthalmic Res; 2015 Jan; 53(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 25471052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery.
    Park J, Yum HR, Kim MS, Harrison AR, Kim EC.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1463-9. PubMed ID: 23910714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of macular thickness and inflammatory cytokine levels after microincision versus small incision coaxial cataract surgery.
    Hwang HS, Ahn YJ, Lee HJ, Kim MS, Kim EC.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 94(3):e189-94. PubMed ID: 25828946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Corneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery: Microincision versus standard technique.
    Mencucci R, Ponchietti C, Virgili G, Giansanti F, Menchini U.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1351-4. PubMed ID: 16863974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Two-site phacotrabeculectomy versus bimanual microincision cataract surgery combined with trabeculectomy.
    Bayer A, Erdem U, Mumcuoglu T, Akyol M.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 19(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 19123148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.
    Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Gabriel P, Pfeiffer N, Dick HB.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17011959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Determining factors for corneal endothelial cell loss by using bimanual microincision phacoemulsification and power modulation.
    Mathys KC, Cohen KL, Armstrong BD.
    Cornea; 2007 Oct; 26(9):1049-55. PubMed ID: 17893532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Results of coaxial phacoemulsification through a 1.8-mm microincision in hard cataracts.
    Wilczynski M, Supady E, Loba P, Synder A, Omulecki W.
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011 Oct; 42(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 21210578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 32.