These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

281 related items for PubMed ID: 17195741

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains.
    Runge-Samuelson CL, Abbas PJ, Rubinstein JT, Miller CA, Robinson BK.
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 15276671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Incidence and characteristics of facial nerve stimulation in children with cochlear implants.
    Cushing SL, Papsin BC, Gordon KA.
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1787-91. PubMed ID: 17003731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Direct cochlear nerve monitoring: first report on a new atraumatic, self-retaining electrode.
    Cueva RA, Morris GF, Prioleau GR.
    Am J Otol; 1998 Mar; 19(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 9520057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Biophysical model of an auditory nerve fiber with a novel adaptation component.
    Woo J, Miller CA, Abbas PJ.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Sep; 56(9):2177-80. PubMed ID: 19497810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Transcanal approach for implantation of a cochlear nerve electrode array.
    Kiumehr S, Mahboubi H, Middlebrooks JC, Djalilian HR.
    Laryngoscope; 2013 May; 123(5):1261-5. PubMed ID: 23460260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Comparison of joint torque evoked with monopolar and tripolar-cuff electrodes.
    Tarler MD, Mortimer JT.
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 14518785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
    Koch DB, Downing M, Osberger MJ, Litvak L.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Chronic measurement of the stimulation selectivity of the flat interface nerve electrode.
    Leventhal DK, Durand DM.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1649-58. PubMed ID: 15376513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Temporal damping in response to broadband noise. II. Auditory nerve.
    Joris PX, Louage DH, van der Heijden M.
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Apr; 99(4):1942-52. PubMed ID: 18272875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Effects of electrode-to-fiber distance on temporal neural response with electrical stimulation.
    Mino H, Rubinstein JT, Miller CA, Abbas PJ.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan; 51(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 14723489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. An improved method of reducing stimulus artifact in the electrically evoked whole-nerve potential.
    Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 10981604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Determinants of the effectiveness of electric stimulation of the auditory nerve with cochlear implants: II. Configuration of the stimulating electrodes].
    Kral A, Hartmann R, Klinke R.
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000 Aug; 101(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 10870263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.