These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

221 related items for PubMed ID: 17197327

  • 1. Polyethylene wear and rim fracture in total disc arthroplasty.
    Kurtz SM, van Ooij A, Ross R, de Waal Malefijt J, Peloza J, Ciccarelli L, Villarraga ML.
    Spine J; 2007; 7(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 17197327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Polyethylene wear debris and long-term clinical failure of the Charité disc prosthesis: a study of 4 patients.
    van Ooij A, Kurtz SM, Stessels F, Noten H, van Rhijn L.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan 15; 32(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 17224818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component.
    Kurtz SM, Peloza J, Siskey R, Villarraga ML.
    Spine J; 2005 Jan 15; 5(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 15863092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vivo functional performance of failed Prodisc-L devices: retrieval analysis of lumbar total disc replacements.
    Lebl DR, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP, Wright T, Abjornson C.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep 01; 37(19):E1209-17. PubMed ID: 22531474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The natural history of polyethylene oxidation in total disc replacement.
    Kurtz SM, MacDonald D, Ianuzzi A, van Ooij A, Isaza J, Ross ER, Regan J.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct 15; 34(22):2369-77. PubMed ID: 19789469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. What is the correlation of in vivo wear and damage patterns with in vitro TDR motion response?
    Kurtz SM, Patwardhan A, MacDonald D, Ciccarelli L, van Ooij A, Lorenz M, Zindrick M, O'Leary P, Isaza J, Ross R.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar 01; 33(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 18317190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
    O'Leary P, Nicolakis M, Lorenz MA, Voronov LI, Zindrick MR, Ghanayem A, Havey RM, Carandang G, Sartori M, Gaitanis IN, Fronczak S, Patwardhan AG.
    Spine J; 2005 Mar 01; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Are PEEK-on-Ceramic Bearings an Option for Total Disc Arthroplasty? An In Vitro Tribology Study.
    Siskey R, Ciccarelli L, Lui MK, Kurtz SM.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov 01; 474(11):2428-2440. PubMed ID: 27677290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. UHMWPE wear debris and tissue reactions are reduced for contemporary designs of lumbar total disc replacements.
    Veruva SY, Lanman TH, Isaza JE, MacDonald DW, Kurtz SM, Steinbeck MJ.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Mar 01; 473(3):987-98. PubMed ID: 25367112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Long-term results of one-level lumbar arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up of the CHARITE artificial disc in 106 patients.
    David T.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar 15; 32(6):661-6. PubMed ID: 17413471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Periprosthetic UHMWPE Wear Debris Induces Inflammation, Vascularization, and Innervation After Total Disc Replacement in the Lumbar Spine.
    Veruva SY, Lanman TH, Isaza JE, Freeman TA, Kurtz SM, Steinbeck MJ.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May 15; 475(5):1369-1381. PubMed ID: 27488379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical, radiological, histological and retrieval findings of Activ-L and Mobidisc total disc replacements: a study of two patients.
    Austen S, Punt IM, Cleutjens JP, Willems PC, Kurtz SM, MacDonald DW, van Rhijn LW, van Ooij A.
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun 15; 21 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S513-20. PubMed ID: 22245852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, Bitan FD, Cappuccino A, Geisler FH, Hochschuler SH, Holt RT, Jenis LG, Majd ME, Regan JJ, Tromanhauser SG, Wong DC, Blumenthal SL.
    Spine J; 2009 May 15; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charité lumbar artificial disc replacement.
    Wagner WH, Regan JJ, Leary SP, Lanman TH, Johnson JP, Rao RK, Cossman DV.
    J Vasc Surg; 2006 Dec 15; 44(6):1266-72. PubMed ID: 17145428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Revision of a Charité artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charité artificial disc: case report and explant analysis.
    David T.
    Eur Spine J; 2005 Jun 15; 14(5):507-11. PubMed ID: 15672241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reducing subsidence risk by using rapid manufactured patient-specific intervertebral disc implants.
    de Beer N, Scheffer C.
    Spine J; 2012 Nov 15; 12(11):1060-6. PubMed ID: 23103407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charité disc.
    van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Aug 15; 16(4):369-83. PubMed ID: 12902953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.