These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

246 related items for PubMed ID: 17197499

  • 1. Effects of talker variability on vowel recognition in cochlear implants.
    Chang YP, Fu QJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1331-41. PubMed ID: 17197499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS, Kreft HA.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K, Barco A, Zeng FG.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
    Whitmal NA, Poissant SF, Freyman RL, Helfer KS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Children With Cochlear implants recognize their mother's voice.
    Vongpaisal T, Trehub SE, Schellenberg EG, van Lieshout P, Papsin BC.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):555-66. PubMed ID: 20588121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
    Cullington HE, Zeng FG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Estimation of vowel recognition with cochlear implant simulations.
    Liu C, Fu QJ.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17260858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Mandarin Tone and Vowel Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Talker Variability and Bimodal Hearing.
    Chang YP, Chang RY, Lin CY, Luo X.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Jan; 37(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 26752089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS, Chisolm TH, Blasco GP, Shinnick LJ, Ketter KJ, Krause JC.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei C, Cao K, Wang Z.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
    Kim J, Davis C, Groot C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S, Luo X, Krishnan A.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Dec; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ, Galvin JJ.
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC, Tomblin JB, Turner CW.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise.
    Xu L, Zheng Y.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1758. PubMed ID: 17927435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Neural bases of talker normalization.
    Wong PC, Nusbaum HC, Small SL.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1173-84. PubMed ID: 15453972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ, Chinchilla S, Galvin JJ.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 15492884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.
    Wong LL, Vandali AE, Ciocca V, Luk B, Ip VW, Murray B, Yu HC, Chung I.
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):337-47. PubMed ID: 18569106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effects of auditory-visual vowel identification training on speech recognition under difficult listening conditions.
    Richie C, Kewley-Port D.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1607-19. PubMed ID: 18695021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Henkin Y, Tetin-Schneider S, Hildesheimer M, Kishon-Rabin L.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Dec; 14(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 18781063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.